lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Dec]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/5] drm/i915/dsi: Control panel and backlight enable GPIOs from VBT
From
Date
Hi,

On 16-12-2019 11:26, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 15, 2019 at 5:38 PM Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> Linus, this series starts with the already discussed pinctrl change to
>> export the function to unregister a pinctrl-map. We can either merge this
>> through drm-intel, or you could pick it up and then provide an immutable
>> branch with it for merging into drm-intel-next. Which option do you prefer?
>
> I have created an immutable branch with these changes and pulled it
> to my "devel" branch for v5.6:
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/linusw/linux-pinctrl.git/log/?h=ib-pinctrl-unreg-mappings
>
> Please pull this in and put the other patches on top of that.

Great, thank you.

Jani, a question about how I am supposed to push this (when this has been
also reviewed by some i915 devs and passes CI), can I just do:

dim backmerge drm-intel-next-queued linux-pinctrl/ib-pinctrl-unreg-mappings
cat other-patches | dim apply-branch drm-intel-next-queued
dim push-branch drm-intel-next-queued

Or I guess that dim backmerge is reserved for other drm branches only and I
should do:

dim checkout drm-intel-next-queued
git merge linux-pinctrl/ib-pinctrl-unreg-mappings
cat other-patches | dim apply-branch drm-intel-next-queued
dim push-branch drm-intel-next-queued

Or should I leave merging linux-pinctrl/ib-pinctrl-unreg-mappings into
drm-intel-next-queued up to you?

> I had a bit of mess in my subsystems last kernel cycle so I
> want to avoid that by strictly including all larger commits
> in my trees.

I understand.

Regards,

Hans

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-12-16 12:01    [W:0.089 / U:3.192 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site