lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Dec]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v5 2/7] scsi: ufs-qcom: Add reset control support for host controller
Hi Can,

On 17-12-19, 08:37, cang@codeaurora.org wrote:
> On 2019-12-17 03:12, Jeffrey Hugo wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 12:05 PM Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Can,
> > >
> > > On 14-11-19, 22:09, Can Guo wrote:
> > > > Add reset control for host controller so that host controller can be reset
> > > > as required in its power up sequence.
> > >
> > > I am seeing a regression on UFS on SM8150-mtp with this patch. I think
> > > Jeff is seeing same one lenove laptop on 8998.
> >
> > Confirmed.
> >
> > >
> > > 845 does not seem to have this issue and only thing I can see is
> > > that on
> > > sm8150 and 8998 we define reset as:
> > >
> > > resets = <&gcc GCC_UFS_BCR>;
> > > reset-names = "rst";
> > >
>
> Hi Jeffrey and Vinod,
>
> Thanks for reporting this. May I know what kind of regression do you see on
> 8150 and 8998?
> BTW, do you have reset control for UFS PHY in your DT?
> See 71278b058a9f8752e51030e363b7a7306938f64e.
>
> FYI, we use reset control on all of our platforms and it is
> a must during our power up sequence.

Yes we do have this and additionally both the DTS describe a 'rst' reset
and this patch tries to use this.

Can you please tell me which platform this was tested on how the reset
was described in DT

Thanks
--
~Vinod

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-12-17 05:15    [W:0.051 / U:9.908 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site