Messages in this thread |  | | From | Jerome Brunet <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/3] clk: let clock perform allocation in init | Date | Mon, 16 Dec 2019 10:17:25 +0100 |
| |
On Tue 03 Dec 2019 at 10:05, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org> wrote:
> Quoting Jerome Brunet (2019-11-29 07:36:28) >> >> On Tue 24 Sep 2019 at 14:39, Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com> wrote: >> >> > This patchset is a follow up on this pinky swear [0]. >> > Its purpose is: >> > * Clarify the acceptable use of clk_ops init() callback >> > * Let the init() callback return an error code in case anything >> > fail. >> > * Add the terminate() counter part of of init() to release the >> > resources which may have been claimed in init() >> > >> > After discussing with Stephen at LPC, I decided to drop the 2 last patches >> > of the RFC [1]. I can live without it for now and nobody expressed a >> > critical need to get the proposed placeholder. >> > >> > [0]: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/CAEG3pNB-143Pr_xCTPj=tURhpiTiJqi61xfDGDVdU7zG5H-2tA@mail.gmail.com >> > [1]: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190828102012.4493-1-jbrunet@baylibre.com >> > >> >> Hi Stephen, >> >> Do you think we can fit this into the incoming cycle ? >> > > Sorry I missed this one. I'll apply it soon but won't be for this merge > window.
No worries, I was referring to the v5.6 cycle, not the v5.5 merge window.
|  |