lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Dec]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
Subjectlinux-next: manual merge of the ipsec-next tree with the net-next tree
Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the ipsec-next tree got a conflict in:

net/unix/af_unix.c

between commit:

3c32da19a858 ("unix: Show number of pending scm files of receive queue in fdinfo")

from the net-next tree and commit:

b50b0580d27b ("net: add queue argument to __skb_wait_for_more_packets and __skb_{,try_}recv_datagram")

from the ipsec-next tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

diff --cc net/unix/af_unix.c
index 6756a3ccc392,a7f707fc4cac..000000000000
--- a/net/unix/af_unix.c
+++ b/net/unix/af_unix.c
@@@ -2100,8 -2058,8 +2100,8 @@@ static int unix_dgram_recvmsg(struct so
mutex_lock(&u->iolock);

skip = sk_peek_offset(sk, flags);
- skb = __skb_try_recv_datagram(sk, flags, scm_stat_del,
- &skip, &err, &last);
+ skb = __skb_try_recv_datagram(sk, &sk->sk_receive_queue, flags,
- NULL, &skip, &err, &last);
++ scm_stat_del, &skip, &err, &last);
if (skb)
break;

[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-12-16 00:39    [W:0.022 / U:2.116 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site