[lkml]   [2019]   [Dec]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
Subjectlinux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the net tree
Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the net-next tree got a conflict in:


between commit:

24dee0c7478d ("net: ena: fix napi handler misbehavior when the napi budget is zero")

from the net tree and commit:

548c4940b9f1 ("net: ena: Implement XDP_TX action")

from the net-next tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

Stephen Rothwell

diff --cc drivers/net/ethernet/amazon/ena/ena_netdev.c
index 948583fdcc28,26954fde4766..000000000000
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/amazon/ena/ena_netdev.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/amazon/ena/ena_netdev.c
@@@ -1237,9 -1861,8 +1861,8 @@@ static int ena_io_poll(struct napi_stru
struct ena_napi *ena_napi = container_of(napi, struct ena_napi, napi);
struct ena_ring *tx_ring, *rx_ring;
- u32 tx_work_done;
- u32 rx_work_done;
+ int tx_work_done;
+ int rx_work_done = 0;
int tx_budget;
int napi_comp_call = 0;
int ret;
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-12-16 00:06    [W:0.029 / U:3.176 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site