[lkml]   [2019]   [Dec]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] dt-bindings: pwm: fix nodename pattern

On 12/12/19 8:07 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 2:16 AM Benjamin GAIGNARD
> <> wrote:
>> On 12/11/19 8:52 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
>>> On Wed, Dec 11, 2019 at 9:00 AM Benjamin Gaignard
>>> <> wrote:
>>>> Typical pwm nodes should be named pwm@xxx.
>>>> The pattern shouldn't match nodes named pwm-xxx to avoid
>>>> conflicts with pinmux or pwm-fan nodes.
>>> It only matches pwm-$(a-hex-number), not any string, so that shouldn't
>>> be a problem. This is needed for things like GPIO based devices (not
>>> just PWMs) which don't have any address.
>>> Pinmux nodes are going to need to adopt some sort of standard pattern
>>> we can match on.
>> I have push a patch to stop using '@' and '_' in pinmux groups names:
>> It remove the warnings when compiling the devicetre with W=12 but pwm.yaml
>> complain because pwm pinmux is named pwm-1.
>> How can I solve these issues at the same time ?
> Name the nodes *-pins or *-pins-[0-9]. You're probably going to need
> some pattern anyways when you do a pinmux schema.
+ Alex because that impact pin node pattern in st,stm32-pinctrl.yaml


> Rob
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-12-13 12:13    [W:0.030 / U:0.116 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site