Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Fri, 13 Dec 2019 02:48:12 +0200 | From | Laurent Pinchart <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] drm: rcar-du: Add r8a77980 support |
| |
Hi Kieran,
On Mon, Dec 09, 2019 at 12:41:07PM +0000, Kieran Bingham wrote: > On 13/09/2019 10:03, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 10:21:29AM +0200, Simon Horman wrote: > >> On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 01:00:41PM +0300, Sergei Shtylyov wrote: > >>> On 11.09.2019 22:25, Kieran Bingham wrote: > >>> > >>>> Add direct support for the r8a77980 (V3H). > >>>> > >>>> The V3H shares a common, compatible configuration with the r8a77970 > >>>> (V3M) so that device info structure is reused. > >>> > >>> Do we really need to add yet another compatible in this case? > >>> I just added r8a77970 to the compatible prop in the r8a77980 DT. That's why > >>> a patch like this one didn't get posted by me. > >> > >> The reason for having per-SoC compat strings is that the IP blocks > >> are not versioned and while we can observe that there are similarities > >> between, f.e. the DU on the r8a77970 and r8a77980, we can't be certain that > >> differences may not emerge at some point. By having per-SoC compat strings > >> we have the flexibility for the driver to address any such differences as > >> the need arises. > >> > >> My recollection is that this scheme has been adopted for non-versioned > >> Renesas IP blocks since June 2015 and uses of this scheme well before that. > > > > Sure, but we could use > > > > compatible = "renesas,du-r8a77980", "renesas,du-r8a77970"; > > > > in DT without updating the driver. If the r8a77980 turns out to be > > different, we'll then update the driver without a need to modify DT. I'm > > fine either way, so > > > > Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com> > > Thanks, > > This patch has an RB tag from you, and Simon, but alas I don't believe > it has been picked up in your drm/du/next branch. > > Is this patch acceptable? Or do I need to repost?
Could you just confirm I should apply this patch, and not go for the alternative proposal above ?
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham+renesas@ideasonboard.com> > >> > >> Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au>
-- Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
|  |