lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Dec]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/7] clk: qcom: add support for setting the duty cycle
Hi Taniya,

On Tue, Dec 10, 2019 at 04:47:35AM +0000, Taniya Das wrote:
> On 12/5/2019 5:54 AM, Brian Masney wrote:
> > Add support for setting the duty cycle via the D register for the
> > Qualcomm clocks.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Brian Masney <masneyb@onstation.org>
> > ---
> > A few quirks that were noted when varying the speed of CAMSS_GP1_CLK on
> > msm8974 (Nexus 5 phone):
> >
> > - The mnd_width is set to 8 bits, however the d width is actually 7
> > bits, at least for this clock. I'm not sure about the other clocks.
> >
> > - When the d register has a value less than 17, the following error
> > from update_config() is shown: rcg didn't update its configuration.
> > So this patch keeps the value of the d register within the range
> > [17, 127].
> >
> > I'm not sure about the relationship of the m, n, and d values,
> > especially how the 50% duty cycle is calculated by inverting the n
> > value, so that's why I'm saving the duty cycle ratio for
> > get_duty_cycle().
> >
> > drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rcg.h | 4 +++
> > drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rcg2.c | 61 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> > 2 files changed, 63 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rcg.h b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rcg.h
> > index 78358b81d249..c3b8732cec8f 100644
> > --- a/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rcg.h
> > +++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rcg.h
> > @@ -139,6 +139,8 @@ extern const struct clk_ops clk_dyn_rcg_ops;
> > * @freq_tbl: frequency table
> > * @clkr: regmap clock handle
> > * @cfg_off: defines the cfg register offset from the CMD_RCGR + CFG_REG
> > + * @duty_cycle_num: Numerator of the duty cycle ratio
> > + * @duty_cycle_den: Denominator of the duty cycle ratio
> > */
> > struct clk_rcg2 {
> > u32 cmd_rcgr;
> > @@ -149,6 +151,8 @@ struct clk_rcg2 {
> > const struct freq_tbl *freq_tbl;
> > struct clk_regmap clkr;
> > u8 cfg_off;
> > + int duty_cycle_num;
> > + int duty_cycle_den;
> > };
> > #define to_clk_rcg2(_hw) container_of(to_clk_regmap(_hw), struct clk_rcg2, clkr)
> > diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rcg2.c b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rcg2.c
> > index 8f4b9bec2956..8d685baefe50 100644
> > --- a/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rcg2.c
> > +++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rcg2.c
> > @@ -258,7 +258,11 @@ static int clk_rcg2_determine_floor_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
> > return _freq_tbl_determine_rate(hw, rcg->freq_tbl, req, FLOOR);
> > }
> > -static int __clk_rcg2_configure(struct clk_rcg2 *rcg, const struct freq_tbl *f)
> > +static int __clk_rcg2_configure_with_duty_cycle(struct clk_rcg2 *rcg,
> > + const struct freq_tbl *f,
> > + int d_reg_val,
> > + int duty_cycle_num,
> > + int duty_cycle_den)
> > {
> > u32 cfg, mask;
> > struct clk_hw *hw = &rcg->clkr.hw;
> > @@ -280,9 +284,12 @@ static int __clk_rcg2_configure(struct clk_rcg2 *rcg, const struct freq_tbl *f)
> > return ret;
> > ret = regmap_update_bits(rcg->clkr.regmap,
> > - RCG_D_OFFSET(rcg), mask, ~f->n);
> > + RCG_D_OFFSET(rcg), mask, d_reg_val);
> > if (ret)
> > return ret;
> > +
> > + rcg->duty_cycle_num = duty_cycle_num;
> > + rcg->duty_cycle_den = duty_cycle_den;
> > }
> > mask = BIT(rcg->hid_width) - 1;
> > @@ -295,6 +302,12 @@ static int __clk_rcg2_configure(struct clk_rcg2 *rcg, const struct freq_tbl *f)
> > mask, cfg);
> > }
> > +static int __clk_rcg2_configure(struct clk_rcg2 *rcg, const struct freq_tbl *f)
> > +{
> > + /* Set a 50% duty cycle */
> > + return __clk_rcg2_configure_with_duty_cycle(rcg, f, ~f->n, 1, 2);
> > +}
> > +
> > static int clk_rcg2_configure(struct clk_rcg2 *rcg, const struct freq_tbl *f)
> > {
> > int ret;
> > @@ -353,6 +366,32 @@ static int clk_rcg2_set_floor_rate_and_parent(struct clk_hw *hw,
> > return __clk_rcg2_set_rate(hw, rate, FLOOR);
> > }
> > +static int clk_rcg2_get_duty_cycle(struct clk_hw *hw, struct clk_duty *duty)
> > +{
> > + struct clk_rcg2 *rcg = to_clk_rcg2(hw);
> > +
> > + duty->num = rcg->duty_cycle_num;
> > + duty->den = rcg->duty_cycle_den;
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int clk_rcg2_set_duty_cycle(struct clk_hw *hw, struct clk_duty *duty)
> > +{
> > + struct clk_rcg2 *rcg = to_clk_rcg2(hw);
> > + int ret, d_reg_val, mask;
> > +
> > + mask = BIT(rcg->mnd_width - 1) - 1;
> > + d_reg_val = mask - (((mask - 17) * duty->num) / duty->den);
> > + ret = __clk_rcg2_configure_with_duty_cycle(rcg, rcg->freq_tbl,
> > + d_reg_val, duty->num,
> > + duty->den);
>
> The duty-cycle calculation is not accurate.
> There is already a plan to submit the duty-cycle changes from my side.

OK... I assume that the m and n values need to be changed as well. I
couldn't find any docs online about the meaning of the m, n, and d
values and how they relate to each other.

Feel free to take over this patch if you find any value in what I posted
here.

> > + if (ret)
> > + return ret;
> > +
> > + return update_config(rcg);
> > +}
> > +
> > const struct clk_ops clk_rcg2_ops = {
> > .is_enabled = clk_rcg2_is_enabled,
> > .get_parent = clk_rcg2_get_parent,
> > @@ -361,6 +400,8 @@ const struct clk_ops clk_rcg2_ops = {
> > .determine_rate = clk_rcg2_determine_rate,
> > .set_rate = clk_rcg2_set_rate,
> > .set_rate_and_parent = clk_rcg2_set_rate_and_parent,
> > + .get_duty_cycle = clk_rcg2_get_duty_cycle,
> > + .set_duty_cycle = clk_rcg2_set_duty_cycle,
> > };
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(clk_rcg2_ops);
> > @@ -372,6 +413,8 @@ const struct clk_ops clk_rcg2_floor_ops = {
> > .determine_rate = clk_rcg2_determine_floor_rate,
> > .set_rate = clk_rcg2_set_floor_rate,
> > .set_rate_and_parent = clk_rcg2_set_floor_rate_and_parent,
> > + .get_duty_cycle = clk_rcg2_get_duty_cycle,
> > + .set_duty_cycle = clk_rcg2_set_duty_cycle,
> > };
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(clk_rcg2_floor_ops);
> > @@ -499,6 +542,8 @@ const struct clk_ops clk_edp_pixel_ops = {
> > .set_rate = clk_edp_pixel_set_rate,
> > .set_rate_and_parent = clk_edp_pixel_set_rate_and_parent,
> > .determine_rate = clk_edp_pixel_determine_rate,
> > + .get_duty_cycle = clk_rcg2_get_duty_cycle,
> > + .set_duty_cycle = clk_rcg2_set_duty_cycle,
> > };
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(clk_edp_pixel_ops);
> > @@ -557,6 +602,8 @@ const struct clk_ops clk_byte_ops = {
> > .set_rate = clk_byte_set_rate,
> > .set_rate_and_parent = clk_byte_set_rate_and_parent,
> > .determine_rate = clk_byte_determine_rate,
> > + .get_duty_cycle = clk_rcg2_get_duty_cycle,
> > + .set_duty_cycle = clk_rcg2_set_duty_cycle,
> > };
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(clk_byte_ops);
> > @@ -627,6 +674,8 @@ const struct clk_ops clk_byte2_ops = {
> > .set_rate = clk_byte2_set_rate,
> > .set_rate_and_parent = clk_byte2_set_rate_and_parent,
> > .determine_rate = clk_byte2_determine_rate,
> > + .get_duty_cycle = clk_rcg2_get_duty_cycle,
> > + .set_duty_cycle = clk_rcg2_set_duty_cycle,
> > };
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(clk_byte2_ops);
> > @@ -717,6 +766,8 @@ const struct clk_ops clk_pixel_ops = {
> > .set_rate = clk_pixel_set_rate,
> > .set_rate_and_parent = clk_pixel_set_rate_and_parent,
> > .determine_rate = clk_pixel_determine_rate,
> > + .get_duty_cycle = clk_rcg2_get_duty_cycle,
> > + .set_duty_cycle = clk_rcg2_set_duty_cycle,
> > };
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(clk_pixel_ops);
> > @@ -804,6 +855,8 @@ const struct clk_ops clk_gfx3d_ops = {
> > .set_rate = clk_gfx3d_set_rate,
> > .set_rate_and_parent = clk_gfx3d_set_rate_and_parent,
> > .determine_rate = clk_gfx3d_determine_rate,
> > + .get_duty_cycle = clk_rcg2_get_duty_cycle,
> > + .set_duty_cycle = clk_rcg2_set_duty_cycle,
> > };
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(clk_gfx3d_ops);
> > @@ -942,6 +995,8 @@ const struct clk_ops clk_rcg2_shared_ops = {
> > .determine_rate = clk_rcg2_determine_rate,
> > .set_rate = clk_rcg2_shared_set_rate,
> > .set_rate_and_parent = clk_rcg2_shared_set_rate_and_parent,
> > + .get_duty_cycle = clk_rcg2_get_duty_cycle,
> > + .set_duty_cycle = clk_rcg2_set_duty_cycle,
> > };
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(clk_rcg2_shared_ops);
> > @@ -1081,6 +1136,8 @@ static const struct clk_ops clk_rcg2_dfs_ops = {
> > .get_parent = clk_rcg2_get_parent,
> > .determine_rate = clk_rcg2_dfs_determine_rate,
> > .recalc_rate = clk_rcg2_dfs_recalc_rate,
> > + .get_duty_cycle = clk_rcg2_get_duty_cycle,
> > + .set_duty_cycle = clk_rcg2_set_duty_cycle,
> > };
> >
>
> Why do you want to support duty-cycle for other RCGs when you are
> specifically want it for GP clocks only.
> The DFS can never handle duty-cycle set/get.

I wrongly assumed that all of variants supported this. I did this
without any of the hardware documentation.

Brian

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-12-10 12:52    [W:0.133 / U:4.172 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site