[lkml]   [2019]   [Dec]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] x86/pat: Fix off-by-one bugs in interval tree search
On Sun, 01 Dec 2019, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>So the correct parameter to use in the interval tree searches is not
>'end' but 'end-1'.

Yes absolutely, I overlooked this in the final conversion. Going through some
older conversions, I had this end-1 at one point. Lookups need half-open intervals,
consistent with what memtype_interval_end() does.


>Patch is only lightly tested, so take care. (Patch is emphatically not
>signed off yet, because I spent most of the day on this and I don't yet
>trust my fix - all of the affected sites need to be reviewed more

As a general note, this is rather consistent with how all interval-tree
users that need [a,b) nodes use the api.


 \ /
  Last update: 2019-12-01 18:06    [W:0.070 / U:0.512 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site