lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Nov]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 4.19 00/93] 4.19.81-stable review
On Thu, Nov 07, 2019 at 04:43:17PM +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Wed, 2019-11-06 at 21:18 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 06, 2019 at 07:59:32PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> [...]
> > > I'm confused. You said "by Tue ... 08:27:02 PM UTC". That 8 PM is 20h,
> > > but did the release on 10h GMT+1, or 9h UTC -- 9 AM.... so like 11
> > > hours early, if I got the timezones right.
> > >
> > > Does PM mean something else in the above context?
> >
> > Ugh, no, you are right, I was ignoring the PM thing, I thought the -u
> > option to date would give me a 24 hour date string, and so I thought
> > that was 8:27 in the morning.
> >
> > Let me mess around with 'date' to see if I can come up with a better
> > string to use here. I guess:
> > date --rfc-3339=seconds -u
> > would probably be best?
>
> The --rfc-822 option should give you something close to the current
> format, but with 24-hour numbering.

Ah, missed that. I'll go use that.

Also, I just remembered that if you look in the email headers, there's a
"X-KernelTest-Deadline:" field that uses the --iso-8601=minutes format.
I think kernelci uses that to parse for when it needs to finish things
by, but I don't know if that actually happens or not.

I'll go fix the string up for the next round.

thanks,

greg k-h

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-11-09 16:55    [W:0.094 / U:1.824 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site