[lkml]   [2019]   [Nov]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] Documentation: riscv: add patch acceptance guidelines
On Sun, Nov 24, 2019 at 6:49 PM Paul Walmsley <> wrote:
> On Sat, 23 Nov 2019, Dan Williams wrote:
> > I'm open to updating the headers to make a section heading that
> > matches what you're trying to convey, however that header definition
> > should be globally agreed upon. I don't want the document that tries
> > to clarify per-subsystem behaviours itself to have per-subsystem
> > permutations. I think we, subsystem maintainers, at least need to be
> > able to agree on the topics we disagree on.
> Unless you're planning to, say, follow up with some kind of automated
> process working across all of the profile documents in such a way that it
> would make technical sense for the different sections to be standardized,
> I personally don't see any need at all for profile document
> standardization. As far as I can tell, these documents are meant for
> humans, rather than computers, to read. And in the absence of a strong
> technical rationale to limit how maintainers express themselves here, I
> don't think it's justified.

It's just a template, you're free to make sub-headings of your own
choosing, but please try to give a contributor that is spanning
subsystems a chance to navigate similar information across profile

 \ /
  Last update: 2019-11-25 04:21    [W:0.043 / U:3.088 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site