[lkml]   [2019]   [Nov]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
Subjectlinux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the net tree
Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the net-next tree got a conflict in:


between commit:

c8183f548902 ("s390/qeth: fix potential deadlock on workqueue flush")

from the net tree and commit:

9897d583b015 ("s390/qeth: consolidate some duplicated HW cmd code")

from the net-next tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

Stephen Rothwell

diff --cc drivers/s390/net/qeth_l2_main.c
index 4bccdce19b5a,ae69c981650d..000000000000
--- a/drivers/s390/net/qeth_l2_main.c
+++ b/drivers/s390/net/qeth_l2_main.c
@@@ -802,14 -779,6 +784,7 @@@ static int qeth_l2_set_online(struct cc
goto out_remove;

- if (qeth_is_diagass_supported(card, QETH_DIAGS_CMD_TRAP)) {
- if (card->info.hwtrap &&
- qeth_hw_trap(card, QETH_DIAGS_TRAP_ARM))
- card->info.hwtrap = 0;
- } else
- card->info.hwtrap = 0;
+ mutex_lock(&card->sbp_lock);
if (card->options.sbp.supported_funcs)
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-11-21 01:49    [W:0.020 / U:0.124 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site