lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Nov]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v3 3/3] i2c: smbus: switch from loops to memcpy
On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 08:47:57AM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> Hello Dmitry,
>
> On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 12:31:32PM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > When copying memory from one buffer to another, instead of open-coding
> > loops with byte-by-byte copies let's use memcpy() which might be a bit
> > faster and makes intent more clear.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
> >
> > ---
> >
> > Changes in v3:
> > - new patch using memcpy() for moving data around
> >
> > drivers/i2c/i2c-core-smbus.c | 15 +++++----------
> > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-smbus.c b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-smbus.c
> > index 7b4e2270eeda1..bbafdd3b1b114 100644
> > --- a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-smbus.c
> > +++ b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-smbus.c
> > @@ -397,8 +397,7 @@ static s32 i2c_smbus_xfer_emulated(struct i2c_adapter *adapter, u16 addr,
> > }
> >
> > i2c_smbus_try_get_dmabuf(&msg[0], command);
> > - for (i = 1; i < msg[0].len; i++)
> > - msg[0].buf[i] = data->block[i - 1];
> > + memcpy(msg[0].buf + 1, data->block, msg[0].len - 1);
>
> Can it happen that msg[0].len is zero?

No, it can not, because of the "msg[0].len = data->block[0] + 2;" line
above.

Thanks.

--
Dmitry

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-11-18 09:10    [W:0.071 / U:6.488 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site