lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Oct]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 06/18] add support for Clang's Shadow Call Stack (SCS)
On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 09:30:53AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 05:28:27PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 09:10:21AM -0700, Sami Tolvanen wrote:
> > > +ifdef CONFIG_SHADOW_CALL_STACK
> > > +KBUILD_CFLAGS += -fsanitize=shadow-call-stack
> > > +DISABLE_SCS := -fno-sanitize=shadow-call-stack
> > > +export DISABLE_SCS
> > > +endif
> >
> > I think it would be preferable to follow the example of CC_FLAGS_FTRACE
> > so that this can be filtered out, e.g.
> >
> > ifdef CONFIG_SHADOW_CALL_STACK
> > CFLAGS_SCS := -fsanitize=shadow-call-stack
> ^^^ was this meant to be CC_FLAGS_SCS here
>
> > KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(CFLAGS_SCS)
> ^^^ and here?

Whoops; yes in both cases...

> > export CC_FLAGS_SCS
> > endif
> >
> > ... with removal being:
> >
> > CFLAGS_REMOVE := $(CC_FLAGS_SCS)
> >
> > ... or:
> >
> > CFLAGS_REMOVE_obj.o := $(CC_FLAGS_SCS)
> >
> > That way you only need to define the flags once, so the enable and
> > disable falgs remain in sync by construction.
^^^^^ "flags" here, too.

Mark.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-10-22 18:50    [W:0.204 / U:4.824 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site