lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Oct]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 18/18] arm64: implement Shadow Call Stack
On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 10:35:49AM -0700, Sami Tolvanen wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 10:23 AM Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> wrote:
> > I think scs_save() would better live in assembly in cpu_switch_to(),
> > where we switch the stack and current. It shouldn't matter whether
> > scs_load() is inlined or not, since the x18 value _should_ be invariant
> > from the PoV of the task.
>
> Note that there's also a call to scs_save in cpu_die, because the
> current task's shadow stack pointer is only stored in x18 and we don't
> want to lose it.
>
> > We just need to add a TSK_TI_SCS to asm-offsets.c, and then insert a
> > single LDR at the end:
> >
> > mov sp, x9
> > msr sp_el0, x1
> > #ifdef CONFIG_SHADOW_CALL_STACK
> > ldr x18, [x1, TSK_TI_SCS]
> > #endif
> > ret
>
> TSK_TI_SCS is already defined, so yes, we could move this to
> cpu_switch_to. I would still prefer to have the overflow check that's
> in scs_thread_switch though.

The only bit that I think needs to be in cpu_switch_to() is the install
of the next task's shadow addr into x18.

Having a separate scs_check_overflow() sounds fine to me, as that only
has to read from the shadow stack. IIUC that's also for the prev task,
not next, in the current patches.

Thanks,
Mark.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-10-21 18:51    [W:0.270 / U:11.772 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site