lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Oct]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v1 00/17] NVIDIA Tegra20 CPUFreq driver major update
On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 04:16:27PM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> 16.10.2019 08:27, Viresh Kumar пишет:
> > On 16-10-19, 00:16, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> This series moves intermediate-clk handling from tegra20-cpufreq into
> >> tegra-clk driver, this allows us to switch to generic cpufreq-dt driver
> >> which brings voltage scaling, per-hardware OPPs and Tegra30 support out
> >> of the box. All boards need to adopt CPU OPPs in their device-trees in
> >> order to get cpufreq support. This series adds OPPs only to selective
> >> boards because there is assumption in a current device-trees that CPU
> >> voltage is set for 1GHz freq and this won't work for those CPUs that
> >> can go over 1GHz and thus require voltage regulators to be set up for
> >> voltage scaling support (CC'ed Marcel for Toradex boards). We could
> >> probably add delete-node for OPPs over 1GHz if there are not actively
> >> maintained boards.
> >
> > How do you want to get these patches merged ? Can I just pick the cpufreq bits
> > alone ?
> >
>
> The cpufreq bits strictly depend on the clk patches and the regulators
> coupler/balancer series. Hence all patches in this series should collect
> acks from relevant maintainers and then Thierry will pick up the
> patchsets in a correct order via tegra tree, at least that's my vision.
>
> Thierry, are you okay with that approach?

Works for me. I already have a set of clock patches that I'd like to
merge via the Tegra tree because of a runtime dependency, so it'd be
easy to apply these on top of that.

Thierry
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-10-16 16:03    [W:0.062 / U:1.152 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site