lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Oct]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH] net: bpf: add static in net/core/filter.c
From
Date
On 16/10/2019 13:26, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 12:04:46PM +0100, Ben Dooks (Codethink) wrote:
>> There are a number of structs in net/core/filter.c
>> that are not exported or declared outside of the
>> file. Fix the following warnings by making these
>> all static:
>>
>> net/core/filter.c:8465:31: warning: symbol 'sk_filter_verifier_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
>> net/core/filter.c:8472:27: warning: symbol 'sk_filter_prog_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
> [...]
>> net/core/filter.c:8935:27: warning: symbol 'sk_reuseport_prog_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk>
>> ---
>> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
>> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
>> Cc: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
>> Cc: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
>> Cc: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
>> Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
>> Cc: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
>> Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@kernel.org>
>> Cc: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
>> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
>> Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org
>> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
>> ---
>> net/core/filter.c | 60 +++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
>> 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/net/core/filter.c b/net/core/filter.c
>> index ed6563622ce3..f7338fee41f8 100644
>> --- a/net/core/filter.c
>> +++ b/net/core/filter.c
>> @@ -8462,18 +8462,18 @@ static u32 sk_msg_convert_ctx_access(enum bpf_access_type type,
>> return insn - insn_buf;
>> }
>>
>> -const struct bpf_verifier_ops sk_filter_verifier_ops = {
>> +static const struct bpf_verifier_ops sk_filter_verifier_ops = {
>> .get_func_proto = sk_filter_func_proto,
>> .is_valid_access = sk_filter_is_valid_access,
>> .convert_ctx_access = bpf_convert_ctx_access,
>> .gen_ld_abs = bpf_gen_ld_abs,
>> };
>
> Big obvious NAK. I'm puzzled that you try to fix a compile warning, but without
> even bothering to compile the result after your patch ...

builds fine. maybe some effort to stop this happening again should be made.

> Seen BPF_PROG_TYPE() ?




--
Ben Dooks http://www.codethink.co.uk/
Senior Engineer Codethink - Providing Genius

https://www.codethink.co.uk/privacy.html

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-10-16 15:03    [W:0.074 / U:0.336 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site