lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Oct]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] clk: qcom: gcc: Add missing clocks in SM8150
Hi Steve,

Looks like I missed replying to this one, apologies!

On 17-09-19, 09:09, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Vinod Koul (2019-09-17 02:16:23)
> > The initial upstreaming of SM8150 GCC driver missed few clock so add
> > them up now.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
> > ---
>
> Should have some sort of fixes tag?

Not really, the drivers to use these clks are not upstream so we dont
miss it yet

>
> > drivers/clk/qcom/gcc-sm8150.c | 172 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 172 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/gcc-sm8150.c b/drivers/clk/qcom/gcc-sm8150.c
> > index 12ca2d14797f..13d4d14a5744 100644
> > --- a/drivers/clk/qcom/gcc-sm8150.c
> > +++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/gcc-sm8150.c
> > @@ -1616,6 +1616,38 @@ static struct clk_branch gcc_gpu_cfg_ahb_clk = {
> > },
> > };
> >
> > +static struct clk_branch gcc_gpu_gpll0_clk_src = {
> > + .halt_check = BRANCH_HALT_SKIP,
>
> Why skip?

I will explore and add comments for that

> > + .clkr = {
> > + .enable_reg = 0x52004,
> > + .enable_mask = BIT(15),
> > + .hw.init = &(struct clk_init_data){
> > + .name = "gcc_gpu_gpll0_clk_src",
> > + .parent_hws = (const struct clk_hw *[]){
> > + &gpll0.clkr.hw },
> > + .num_parents = 1,
> > + .flags = CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT,
> > + .ops = &clk_branch2_ops,
> > + },
> > + },
> > +};
> > +
> > +static struct clk_branch gcc_gpu_gpll0_div_clk_src = {
> > + .halt_check = BRANCH_HALT_SKIP,
>
> Why skip?
>
> > + .clkr = {
> > + .enable_reg = 0x52004,
> > + .enable_mask = BIT(16),
> > + .hw.init = &(struct clk_init_data){
> > + .name = "gcc_gpu_gpll0_div_clk_src",
> > + .parent_hws = (const struct clk_hw *[]){
> > + &gcc_gpu_gpll0_clk_src.clkr.hw },
> > + .num_parents = 1,
> > + .flags = CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT,
> > + .ops = &clk_branch2_ops,
> > + },
> > + },
> > +};
> > +
> > static struct clk_branch gcc_gpu_iref_clk = {
> > .halt_reg = 0x8c010,
> > .halt_check = BRANCH_HALT,
> > @@ -1698,6 +1730,38 @@ static struct clk_branch gcc_npu_cfg_ahb_clk = {
> > },
> > };
> >
> > +static struct clk_branch gcc_npu_gpll0_clk_src = {
> > + .halt_check = BRANCH_HALT_SKIP,
> > + .clkr = {
> > + .enable_reg = 0x52004,
> > + .enable_mask = BIT(18),
> > + .hw.init = &(struct clk_init_data){
> > + .name = "gcc_npu_gpll0_clk_src",
> > + .parent_hws = (const struct clk_hw *[]){
> > + &gpll0.clkr.hw },
> > + .num_parents = 1,
> > + .flags = CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT,
> > + .ops = &clk_branch2_ops,
> > + },
> > + },
> > +};
> > +
> > +static struct clk_branch gcc_npu_gpll0_div_clk_src = {
> > + .halt_check = BRANCH_HALT_SKIP,
> > + .clkr = {
> > + .enable_reg = 0x52004,
> > + .enable_mask = BIT(19),
> > + .hw.init = &(struct clk_init_data){
> > + .name = "gcc_npu_gpll0_div_clk_src",
> > + .parent_hws = (const struct clk_hw *[]){
> > + &gcc_npu_gpll0_clk_src.clkr.hw },
> > + .num_parents = 1,
> > + .flags = CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT,
> > + .ops = &clk_branch2_ops,
> > + },
> > + },
> > +};
> > +
> > static struct clk_branch gcc_npu_trig_clk = {
> > .halt_reg = 0x4d00c,
> > .halt_check = BRANCH_VOTED,
> > @@ -2812,6 +2876,42 @@ static struct clk_branch gcc_ufs_card_phy_aux_hw_ctl_clk = {
> > },
> > };
> >
> > +static struct clk_branch gcc_ufs_card_rx_symbol_0_clk = {
> > + .halt_check = BRANCH_HALT_SKIP,
>
> Can't we fix the UFS driver to not require this anymore? This is the
> fourth or fifth time I've asked for this.

yeah Bjorn did tell me that and I think there was some other thread on
similar lines. So is this fine by you.

--
~Vinod

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-10-16 14:24    [W:0.058 / U:11.456 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site