lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Oct]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v10 5/6] arm64: dts: allwinner: a64: Add MIPI DSI pipeline
On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 05:37:50PM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 7, 2019 at 4:27 PM Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Oct 05, 2019 at 07:49:12PM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote:
> > > Add MIPI DSI pipeline for Allwinner A64.
> > >
> > > - dsi node, with A64 compatible since it doesn't support
> > > DSI_SCLK gating unlike A33
> > > - dphy node, with A64 compatible with A33 fallback since
> > > DPHY on A64 and A33 is similar
> > > - finally, attach the dsi_in to tcon0 for complete MIPI DSI
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Jagan Teki <jagan@amarulasolutions.com>
> > > Tested-by: Merlijn Wajer <merlijn@wizzup.org>
> > > ---
> > > arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64.dtsi | 38 +++++++++++++++++++
> > > 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64.dtsi
> > > index 69128a6dfc46..ad4170b8aee0 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64.dtsi
> > > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64.dtsi
> > > @@ -382,6 +382,12 @@
> > > #address-cells = <1>;
> > > #size-cells = <0>;
> > > reg = <1>;
> > > +
> > > + tcon0_out_dsi: endpoint@1 {
> > > + reg = <1>;
> > > + remote-endpoint = <&dsi_in_tcon0>;
> > > + allwinner,tcon-channel = <1>;
> > > + };
> > > };
> > > };
> > > };
> > > @@ -1003,6 +1009,38 @@
> > > status = "disabled";
> > > };
> > >
> > > + dsi: dsi@1ca0000 {
> > > + compatible = "allwinner,sun50i-a64-mipi-dsi";
> > > + reg = <0x01ca0000 0x1000>;
> > > + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 89 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> > > + clocks = <&ccu CLK_BUS_MIPI_DSI>;
> > > + clock-names = "bus";
> >
> > This won't validate with the bindings you have either here, since it
> > still expects bus and mod.
> >
> > I guess in that cas, we can just drop clock-names, which will require
> > a bit of work on the driver side as well.
>
> Okay.
> mod clock is not required for a64, ie reason we have has_mod_clk quirk
> patch. Adjust the clock-names: on dt-bindings would make sense here,
> what do you think?

I'm confused, what are you suggesting?

Maxime
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-10-16 10:03    [W:0.100 / U:1.600 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site