lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Oct]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
Date
From
Subject[tip: irq/urgent] irqchip/sifive-plic: Switch to fasteoi flow
The following commit has been merged into the irq/urgent branch of tip:

Commit-ID: bb0fed1c60cccbe4063b455a7228818395dac86e
Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/bb0fed1c60cccbe4063b455a7228818395dac86e
Author: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
AuthorDate: Sun, 15 Sep 2019 15:17:45 +01:00
Committer: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
CommitterDate: Wed, 18 Sep 2019 12:29:52 +01:00

irqchip/sifive-plic: Switch to fasteoi flow

The SiFive PLIC interrupt controller seems to have all the HW
features to support the fasteoi flow, but the driver seems to be
stuck in a distant past. Bring it into the 21st century.

Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@sifive.com> (QEMU Boot)
Tested-by: Darius Rad <darius@bluespec.com> (on 2 HW PLIC implementations)
Tested-by: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com> (HiFive Unleashed)
Reviewed-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@sifive.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/8636gxskmj.wl-maz@kernel.org
---
drivers/irqchip/irq-sifive-plic.c | 29 +++++++++++++++--------------
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-sifive-plic.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-sifive-plic.c
index cf75596..3e51dee 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-sifive-plic.c
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-sifive-plic.c
@@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ static inline void plic_irq_toggle(const struct cpumask *mask,
}
}

-static void plic_irq_enable(struct irq_data *d)
+static void plic_irq_unmask(struct irq_data *d)
{
unsigned int cpu = cpumask_any_and(irq_data_get_affinity_mask(d),
cpu_online_mask);
@@ -106,7 +106,7 @@ static void plic_irq_enable(struct irq_data *d)
plic_irq_toggle(cpumask_of(cpu), d->hwirq, 1);
}

-static void plic_irq_disable(struct irq_data *d)
+static void plic_irq_mask(struct irq_data *d)
{
plic_irq_toggle(cpu_possible_mask, d->hwirq, 0);
}
@@ -125,10 +125,8 @@ static int plic_set_affinity(struct irq_data *d,
if (cpu >= nr_cpu_ids)
return -EINVAL;

- if (!irqd_irq_disabled(d)) {
- plic_irq_toggle(cpu_possible_mask, d->hwirq, 0);
- plic_irq_toggle(cpumask_of(cpu), d->hwirq, 1);
- }
+ plic_irq_toggle(cpu_possible_mask, d->hwirq, 0);
+ plic_irq_toggle(cpumask_of(cpu), d->hwirq, 1);

irq_data_update_effective_affinity(d, cpumask_of(cpu));

@@ -136,14 +134,18 @@ static int plic_set_affinity(struct irq_data *d,
}
#endif

+static void plic_irq_eoi(struct irq_data *d)
+{
+ struct plic_handler *handler = this_cpu_ptr(&plic_handlers);
+
+ writel(d->hwirq, handler->hart_base + CONTEXT_CLAIM);
+}
+
static struct irq_chip plic_chip = {
.name = "SiFive PLIC",
- /*
- * There is no need to mask/unmask PLIC interrupts. They are "masked"
- * by reading claim and "unmasked" when writing it back.
- */
- .irq_enable = plic_irq_enable,
- .irq_disable = plic_irq_disable,
+ .irq_mask = plic_irq_mask,
+ .irq_unmask = plic_irq_unmask,
+ .irq_eoi = plic_irq_eoi,
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
.irq_set_affinity = plic_set_affinity,
#endif
@@ -152,7 +154,7 @@ static struct irq_chip plic_chip = {
static int plic_irqdomain_map(struct irq_domain *d, unsigned int irq,
irq_hw_number_t hwirq)
{
- irq_set_chip_and_handler(irq, &plic_chip, handle_simple_irq);
+ irq_set_chip_and_handler(irq, &plic_chip, handle_fasteoi_irq);
irq_set_chip_data(irq, NULL);
irq_set_noprobe(irq);
return 0;
@@ -188,7 +190,6 @@ static void plic_handle_irq(struct pt_regs *regs)
hwirq);
else
generic_handle_irq(irq);
- writel(hwirq, claim);
}
csr_set(sie, SIE_SEIE);
}
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-10-14 20:39    [W:0.193 / U:3.572 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site