[lkml]   [2019]   [Oct]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] proc: centralise declaration of cpuinfo_op
On 09/10/2019 18:51, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 09, 2019 at 12:39:30PM +0100, Ben Dooks wrote:
>> When building for arm, cpuinfo_op generates a warning due
>> to no declaration. Since this is used in fs/proc/cpuinfo.c
>> and inconsitently declared across archiectures move the
>> declaration info <linux/seq_file.h>. This means that the
>> cpuinfo_op will have a declaration any place it is used.
>> Removes the following sparse warning:
>> arch/arm/kernel/setup.c:1320:29: warning: symbol 'cpuinfo_op' was not declared. Should it be static?
> I like the consolidation, but I don't think seq_file.h is the right
> place. A procfs or cpu topology related header seems like the better
> choice.

Ok, thanks.

I'll have a look at where else it could go, but I'm not sure if I have
the resources to build /all/ kernels that this would effect.

Ben Dooks
Senior Engineer Codethink - Providing Genius

 \ /
  Last update: 2019-10-11 15:44    [W:0.032 / U:0.516 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site