lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Jan]   [31]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v3] mfd: tqmx86: IO controller with i2c, wachdog and gpio
On Wed, 30 Jan 2019, Andrew Lunn wrote:

> > > Hi Lee
> > >
> > > I posted a new version.
> > >
> > > Your email indicates you are using Mutt:
> > >
> > > >User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28)
> > >
> > > Which is also what i use. I've never had issues with signatures like
> > > this. I also cannot find any documentation as to how you configure
> > > mutt remove signatures. How are you doing it?
> >
> > I think it's automatic. I certainly didn't set that up.
>
> Interesting. My mutt installation does not do this. I trim emails
> manually to be netiquette compliant.
>
> > Try replying to your own mail. I should automatically cut.
>
> Replying to my patch works fine. It does not cut the patch.
>
> This is a bug somewhere, since the marker i used is not a signature
> marker. It did not have the space on the end.

Yes, you're correct, it should be "-- \n". Give me a sec ...

Ah, it's an Emacs Post-Mode thing:

;;; Revision 1.6.0 1999/03/04 18:04 Rob Reid
;;; Returned post-signature-pattern to using "--" instead of "-- "
;;; because some senders have broken MTAs (as Eric reminded me) and
;;; some users don't use procmail to compensate. This time all of the
;;; functions dealing with signatures have been smartened up to avoid
;;; false matches. Unfortunately that means they don't use
;;; post-signature-pattern in its raw form.

> Anyway, getting the patch reviewed is more important to me than
> tracing down the bug...

Agreed.

--
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Linaro Services Technical Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-01-31 11:23    [W:0.056 / U:1.260 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site