lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Jan]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: WARN_ON_ONCE(!new_owner) within wake_futex_pi() triggered
On Wed, 30 Jan 2019, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Jan 2019, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> The last entries with that uaddr are:
>
> <...>-56956 [005] .... 658.923608: sys_futex(uaddr: 3ff9e880140, op: 7, val: 3ff00000007, utime: 3ff9b078910, uaddr2: 3ff9b078910, val3: 3ffea67e3f7)
>
> UNLOCK
>
> <...>-56945 [006] .... 658.923612: sys_futex(uaddr: 3ff9e880140, op: 6, val: 1, utime: 1003ff0, uaddr2: 3ff9e87f910, val3: 3ff0000de71)
>
> LOCK
>
> <...>-56956 [005] .... 658.923612: sys_futex(uaddr: 3ff9e880140, op: 7, val: 3ff00000007, utime: 3ff9b078910, uaddr2: 3ff9b078910, val3: 3ffea67e3f7)
>
> UNLOCK
>
> <...>-56945 [006] .... 658.923830: sys_futex(uaddr: 3ff9e880140, op: 7, val: 3ff00000007, utime: 3ff9e87f910, uaddr2: 3ff9e87f910, val3: 3ffea67e3f7)
>
> UNLOCK
>
> <...>-56496 [001] .... 658.932404: sys_futex(uaddr: 3ff9e880140, op: 6, val: 1, utime: 0, uaddr2: 5, val3: 0)
>
> LOCK which fails.
>
> This does not make any sense. The last kernel visible operation of 56956 on
> that uaddr is the UNLOCK above.
>
> I need to think some more about what might happen.

TBH, no clue. Below are some more traceprintks which hopefully shed some
light on that mystery. See kernel/futex.c line 30 ...

Thanks,

tglx
8<--------------
--- a/kernel/futex.c
+++ b/kernel/futex.c
@@ -1502,6 +1502,8 @@ static int wake_futex_pi(u32 __user *uad
* died bit, because we are the owner.
*/
newval = FUTEX_WAITERS | task_pid_vnr(new_owner);
+ trace_printk("uaddr: %lx cur: %x new: %x\n",
+ (unsigned long) uaddr, uval, newval);

if (unlikely(should_fail_futex(true)))
ret = -EFAULT;
@@ -2431,6 +2433,8 @@ static int fixup_pi_state_owner(u32 __us
for (;;) {
newval = (uval & FUTEX_OWNER_DIED) | newtid;

+ trace_printk("uaddr: %lx cur: %x new: %x\n",
+ (unsigned long) uaddr, uval, newval);
if (cmpxchg_futex_value_locked(&curval, uaddr, uval, newval))
goto handle_fault;
if (curval == uval)
@@ -2438,6 +2442,8 @@ static int fixup_pi_state_owner(u32 __us
uval = curval;
}

+ trace_printk("uaddr: %lx cur: %x new: %x\n",
+ (unsigned long) uaddr, uval, newval);
/*
* We fixed up user space. Now we need to fix the pi_state
* itself.
@@ -3028,6 +3034,9 @@ static int futex_unlock_pi(u32 __user *u
/* drops pi_state->pi_mutex.wait_lock */
ret = wake_futex_pi(uaddr, uval, pi_state);

+ trace_printk("uaddr: %lx wake: %d\n",
+ (unsigned long) uaddr, ret);
+
put_pi_state(pi_state);

/*
@@ -3056,6 +3065,8 @@ static int futex_unlock_pi(u32 __user *u
goto out_putkey;
}

+ trace_printk("uaddr: %lx cur: %x new: %x\n",
+ (unsigned long) uaddr, uval, 0);
/*
* We have no kernel internal state, i.e. no waiters in the
* kernel. Waiters which are about to queue themselves are stuck
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-01-30 18:57    [W:0.081 / U:0.608 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site