lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Jan]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 02/10] PCI: keystone: Use "dummy_irq_chip" instead of new irqchip for legacy interrupt handling
On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 06:11:59PM +0530, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
> Instead of creating a new irqchip with empty callback functions, use
> dummy_irq_chip. Since there is nothing to do in the irqchip callback
> functions, use handle_simple_irq instead of handle_level_irq.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com>
> ---
> drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-keystone.c | 24 ++---------------------
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-keystone.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-keystone.c
> index 5286a480f76b..1ef443009da5 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-keystone.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-keystone.c
> @@ -266,31 +266,12 @@ static irqreturn_t ks_pcie_handle_error_irq(struct keystone_pcie *ks_pcie)
> return IRQ_HANDLED;
> }
>
> -static void ks_pcie_ack_legacy_irq(struct irq_data *d)
> -{
> -}
> -
> -static void ks_pcie_mask_legacy_irq(struct irq_data *d)
> -{
> -}
> -
> -static void ks_pcie_unmask_legacy_irq(struct irq_data *d)
> -{
> -}
> -
> -static struct irq_chip ks_pcie_legacy_irq_chip = {
> - .name = "Keystone-PCI-Legacy-IRQ",
> - .irq_ack = ks_pcie_ack_legacy_irq,
> - .irq_mask = ks_pcie_mask_legacy_irq,
> - .irq_unmask = ks_pcie_unmask_legacy_irq,
> -};
> -
> static int ks_pcie_init_legacy_irq_map(struct irq_domain *d,
> unsigned int irq,
> irq_hw_number_t hw_irq)
> {
> - irq_set_chip_and_handler(irq, &ks_pcie_legacy_irq_chip,
> - handle_level_irq);
> + irq_set_chip_and_handler(irq, &dummy_irq_chip,
> + handle_simple_irq);

Hi Kishon,

thanks for putting it together. I think I'd rather move some of
the logic for acking the interrupt in ks_pcie_handle_legacy_irq()
into proper irq_chip methods than using a dummy_irq_chip (that
Marc wants to deprecate).

Also, the flow handler should be handle_level_irq() since that's
what legacy IRQs are.

I hope Marc can chime in when he has a minute to help you finalize this.

Overall you are doing the right thing and I would like to get this
series merged for v5.1.

Thanks,
Lorenzo

> irq_set_chip_data(irq, d->host_data);
>
> return 0;
> @@ -298,7 +279,6 @@ static int ks_pcie_init_legacy_irq_map(struct irq_domain *d,
>
> static const struct irq_domain_ops ks_pcie_legacy_irq_domain_ops = {
> .map = ks_pcie_init_legacy_irq_map,
> - .xlate = irq_domain_xlate_onetwocell,
> };
>
> /**
> --
> 2.17.1
>

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-01-24 13:46    [W:0.111 / U:6.688 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site