lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Jan]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH ghak59 V3 2/4] audit: add syscall information to CONFIG_CHANGE records
On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 2:26 PM Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 2019-01-17 12:36, Paul Moore wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 11:08 AM Steve Grubb <sgrubb@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > On Thu, 17 Jan 2019 08:21:40 -0500 Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com> wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 4:33 AM Steve Grubb <sgrubb@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > > > On Mon, 14 Jan 2019 17:58:58 -0500 Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com> wrote:
> > > > > > On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 5:18 PM Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > Tie syscall information to all CONFIG_CHANGE calls since they
> > > > > > > are all a result of user actions.
>
> > I see you added LKML to the To/CC line. Fun. Unless they've been
> > following the audit list for the past several years I'm not sure they
> > have all the context to fully understand some of the things in this
> > thread, but sure, why not.
>
> I added LKML in the original patchset posting, not Steve.

That you did, my apologies. Why did my mail client highlight that as
new? Oh well, my comments stand regardless; I'm just sorry about the
LKML noise I added to the top.

--
paul moore
www.paul-moore.com

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-01-17 20:33    [W:0.041 / U:11.628 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site