lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Jan]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v8 1/3] Bluetooth: hci_qca: use wait_until_sent() for power pulses
Hi Matthias,

On 2019-01-17 01:52, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 05:16:01PM +0530, Balakrishna Godavarthi wrote:
>> wcn3990 requires a power pulse to turn ON/OFF along with
>> regulators. Sometimes we are observing the power pulses are sent
>> out with some time delay, due to queuing these commands. This is
>> causing synchronization issues with chip, which intern delay the
>> chip setup or may end up with communication issues.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Balakrishna Godavarthi <bgodavar@codeaurora.org>
>> ---
>> Changes in v8:
>> * Updated 1 second timeout instead of indefinite wait.
>>
>> Changes in v7:
>> * updated the wait time to 5 ms after sending power pulses.
>>
>> Changes in v6:
>> * added serdev_device_write_flush() in qca_send_power_pulse
>> instead during the power off pulse.
>>
>> Changes in v5:
>> * added serdev_device_write_flush() in qca_power_off().
>> ---
>> drivers/bluetooth/hci_qca.c | 46
>> ++++++++++++++++---------------------
>> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/bluetooth/hci_qca.c b/drivers/bluetooth/hci_qca.c
>> index f036c8f98ea3..681bfa30467e 100644
>> --- a/drivers/bluetooth/hci_qca.c
>> +++ b/drivers/bluetooth/hci_qca.c
>> @@ -60,6 +60,7 @@
>> #define IBS_WAKE_RETRANS_TIMEOUT_MS 100
>> #define IBS_TX_IDLE_TIMEOUT_MS 2000
>> #define BAUDRATE_SETTLE_TIMEOUT_MS 300
>> +#define POWER_PULSE_TRANS_TIMEOUT_MS 1000
>
> nit: Not that it should make a different in normal operation, but 1s
> seems extreme. Is there really any chance that the byte hasn't been
> sent after say 100ms (which is still an eternity for a single byte)?
>
>> /* susclk rate */
>> #define SUSCLK_RATE_32KHZ 32768
>> @@ -1013,11 +1014,10 @@ static inline void host_set_baudrate(struct
>> hci_uart *hu, unsigned int speed)
>> hci_uart_set_baudrate(hu, speed);
>> }
>>
>> -static int qca_send_power_pulse(struct hci_dev *hdev, u8 cmd)
>> +static int qca_send_power_pulse(struct hci_uart *hu, u8 cmd)
>> {
>> - struct hci_uart *hu = hci_get_drvdata(hdev);
>> - struct qca_data *qca = hu->priv;
>> - struct sk_buff *skb;
>> + int ret;
>> + int timeout = __msecs_to_jiffies(POWER_PULSE_TRANS_TIMEOUT_MS);
>
> use msecs_to_jiffies()
>
[Bala]: will upadte.

>> /* These power pulses are single byte command which are sent
>> * at required baudrate to wcn3990. On wcn3990, we have an external
>> @@ -1029,22 +1029,22 @@ static int qca_send_power_pulse(struct hci_dev
>> *hdev, u8 cmd)
>> * save power. Disabling hardware flow control is mandatory while
>> * sending power pulses to SoC.
>> */
>> - bt_dev_dbg(hdev, "sending power pulse %02x to SoC", cmd);
>> -
>> - skb = bt_skb_alloc(sizeof(cmd), GFP_KERNEL);
>> - if (!skb)
>> - return -ENOMEM;
>> + bt_dev_dbg(hu->hdev, "sending power pulse %02x to controller", cmd);
>>
>> + serdev_device_write_flush(hu->serdev);
>> hci_uart_set_flow_control(hu, true);
>> + ret = serdev_device_write_buf(hu->serdev, &cmd, sizeof(cmd));
>> + if (ret < 0) {
>> + bt_dev_err(hu->hdev, "failed to send power pulse %02x", cmd);
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>>
>> - skb_put_u8(skb, cmd);
>> - hci_skb_pkt_type(skb) = HCI_COMMAND_PKT;
>> -
>> - skb_queue_tail(&qca->txq, skb);
>> - hci_uart_tx_wakeup(hu);
>> -
>> - /* Wait for 100 uS for SoC to settle down */
>> - usleep_range(100, 200);
>> + serdev_device_wait_until_sent(hu->serdev, timeout);
>> + /* Wait of 5ms is required for assuring to send the byte on the Tx
>> + * line and also for the controller to settle down for the received
>> + * byte.
>> + */
>> + usleep_range(5000, 6000);
>
> I incorrectly claimed that there might be still bytes sitting in the
> UART FIFO when serdev_device_wait_until_sent() returns, Johan
> corrected me on that (thanks!). So if it takes the SoC 100us to settle
> down we should be good with the original code.

[Bala]: sure will revert, i think he commented that wait_until_sent()
will only guarantee circular buffer is empty. if
wait_until_sent()
guarantee us that the data was transmitted from the FIFO, then
100us will work.
>
> Cheers
>
> Matthias

--
Regards
Balakrishna.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-01-17 11:26    [W:0.093 / U:2.204 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site