lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Jan]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: linux-next: manual merge of the cisco tree with the vfs tree
Hi Daniel,

On Tue, 2 Oct 2018 16:29:23 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the cisco tree got a conflict in:
>
> arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
>
> between commit:
>
> dcf8001d292b ("vfs: Suppress MS_* flag defs within the kernel unless explicitly enabled")
>
> from the vfs tree and commit:
>
> 2c070709ea75 ("This updates the x86 code to use the CONFIG_GENERIC_CMDLINE")
>
> from the cisco tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell
>
> diff --cc arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
> index e493202bf265,ee109f490b22..000000000000
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
> @@@ -51,7 -51,7 +51,8 @@@
> #include <linux/kvm_para.h>
> #include <linux/dma-contiguous.h>
> #include <xen/xen.h>
> +#include <uapi/linux/mount.h>
> + #include <linux/cmdline.h>
>
> #include <linux/errno.h>
> #include <linux/kernel.h>

This is now a conflict between the cicso tree and Linus' tree.

--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-01-14 23:34    [W:0.090 / U:18.356 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site