[lkml]   [2019]   [Jan]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH v3] arm64: dts: meson: Fix mmc cd-gpios polarity


On Fri 11 Jan 2019 at 19:55, Kevin Hilman wrote:

> Martin Blumenstingl <> writes:
>> Hi,
>> some nit-picks as well as my Tested-by (in case it's not too late) below.
>> thank you for taking care of this!
You're welcome !
>> On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 4:40 PM Loys Ollivier <>
>> wrote:
>>> Commit 89a5e15bcba8 ("gpio/mmc/of: Respect polarity in the device tree")
>>> changed the behavior of "cd-inverted" to follow the device tree bindings
>>> specification.
>>> Lines specifying "cd-inverted" are now "active high".
>> this depends on the polarity from the cd-gpios property. above commit
>> caused cd-inverted to be applied twice (effectively making it a
>> no-op). thus "cd-inverted" only means "active high" if cd-gpios also
>> sets GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH. if the polarity in cd-gpios is GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW
>> together with "cd-inverted" then the GPIO will be treated as active
>> low.
Hum ok so there's more to it than the commit message. I'll come by with
something clearer for a v4. Thank you for the clarification.
>>> Fix the SD card for meson by setting the cd-gpios as "active low"
>>> according
>>> to the boards specifications.
>> not only switching to GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW, also dropping "cd-inverted"
>>> Fixes: 89a5e15bcba8 ("gpio/mmc/of: Respect polarity in the device tree")
>> in my patches for the 32-bit boards I used the commit which added SD
>> card support to the board for the Fixes tag. however, I'm fine with
>> this as well (I just wanted to point out that there's a small
>> difference in our commits).
OK, I treat fixes tags as:
from the introduction (or discovery) of a regression (or bug), the
"Fixes" commit will patch the commit that introduced the regression.
Hence why I tagged the commit from which the platform was not acting
correctly anymore. If that's fine for you it's fine for me as well :)
>>> Signed-off-by: Loys Ollivier <>
>> on my Khadas VIM(1), using Kevin's v5.0/fixes branch:
>> Tested-by: Martin Blumenstingl <>
> I can add this tested-by tag in my v5.0/fixes branch for now, and can
> replace it with a follow up if Loys can update the changelog with your
> suggestions/clarifications.
Will do.
> Thanks,
> Kevin


 \ /
  Last update: 2019-01-14 14:31    [W:0.059 / U:3.272 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site