lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Jan]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: WARNING in apparmor_cred_free
On Sat, Jan 12, 2019 at 2:47 AM Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com> wrote:
>
> On 1/11/2019 3:20 PM, Casey Schaufler wrote:
> > On 1/11/2019 2:43 PM, Casey Schaufler wrote:
> >> On 1/11/2019 2:30 PM, John Johansen wrote:
> >>> On 1/11/19 2:11 PM, Casey Schaufler wrote:
> >>>> On 1/11/2019 1:43 AM, syzbot wrote:
> >>>>> Hello,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> syzbot found the following crash on:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> HEAD commit: b808822a75a3 Add linux-next specific files for 20190111
> >>>>> git tree: linux-next
> >>>>> console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=179c22f7400000
> >>>>> kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=c052ead0aed5001b
> >>>>> dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=69ca07954461f189e808
> >>>>> compiler: gcc (GCC) 9.0.0 20181231 (experimental)
> >>>>> syz repro: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.syz?x=162d947f400000
> >>>>> C reproducer: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.c?x=139f6c37400000
> >>>>>
> >>>>> IMPORTANT: if you fix the bug, please add the following tag to the commit:
> >>>>> Reported-by: syzbot+69ca07954461f189e808@syzkaller.appspotmail.com

/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\

Please include the tag for tracking purposes.


> >>>>> ------------[ cut here ]------------
> >>>>> AppArmor WARN cred_label: ((!blob)):
> >>>>> WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 0 at security/apparmor/include/cred.h:30 cred_label security/apparmor/include/cred.h:30 [inline]
> >>>>> WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 0 at security/apparmor/include/cred.h:30 apparmor_cred_free+0x12f/0x1a0 security/apparmor/lsm.c:62
> >>>>> Kernel panic - not syncing: panic_on_warn set ...
> >>>>> CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.0.0-rc1-next-20190111 #10
> >>>>> Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011
> >>>>> Call Trace:
> >>>>> <IRQ>
> >>>>> __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:77 [inline]
> >>>>> dump_stack+0x1db/0x2d0 lib/dump_stack.c:113
> >>>>> panic+0x2cb/0x65c kernel/panic.c:214
> >>>>> __warn.cold+0x20/0x48 kernel/panic.c:571
> >>>>> report_bug+0x263/0x2b0 lib/bug.c:186
> >>>>> fixup_bug arch/x86/kernel/traps.c:178 [inline]
> >>>>> fixup_bug arch/x86/kernel/traps.c:173 [inline]
> >>>>> do_error_trap+0x11b/0x200 arch/x86/kernel/traps.c:271
> >>>>> do_invalid_op+0x37/0x50 arch/x86/kernel/traps.c:290
> >>>>> invalid_op+0x14/0x20 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:973
> >>>>> RIP: 0010:cred_label security/apparmor/include/cred.h:30 [inline]
> >>>>> RIP: 0010:apparmor_cred_free+0x12f/0x1a0 security/apparmor/lsm.c:62
> >>>>> Code: 7c 88 48 c7 c7 00 d0 7c 88 e8 fd 70 f2 fd 0f 0b eb a9 e8 54 3f 29 fe 48 c7 c6 c0 df 7c 88 48 c7 c7 00 d0 7c 88 e8 e1 70 f2 fd <0f> 0b 48 b8 00 00 00 00 00 fc ff df 80 38 00 75 4a 4c 8b 2c 25 00
> >>>>> RSP: 0018:ffff8880ae6079f8 EFLAGS: 00010286
> >>>>> RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 0000000000000000
> >>>>> RDX: 0000000000000100 RSI: ffffffff81687fa6 RDI: 0000000000000006
> >>>>> RBP: ffff8880ae607a18 R08: ffffffff8987dec0 R09: 0000000000000000
> >>>>> R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff8880a86b3100
> >>>>> R13: ffff8880a86b3100 R14: ffff8880a86b3188 R15: dffffc0000000000
> >>>>> security_cred_free+0x4b/0xf0 security/security.c:1490
> >>>> The obvious thing to do is put a check in security_cred_free
> >>>> for a NULL cred->security, in which case the LSM hooks
> >>>> wouldn't get called.
> >>> Right, but the question is should we? To my thinking we shouldn't
> >>> ever have a cred without cred->security, unless the cred was
> >>> allocated but a later step in its construction, say allocating
> >>> ->security failed.
> >> If allocating ->security fails in security_cred_alloc_blank()
> >> or security_prepare_creds() you don't have to do anything but
> >> fail because the LSM hooks are not called before the allocation.
> >>
> >>> In which case I'd rather see the cred directly freed and not
> >>> call into security_cred_free() as I like being able to detect
> >>> corrupt creds.
> >> I think we need to look for some bit of code that's setting
> >> cred->security to NULL inappropriately.
> > If security_cred_alloc_blank() fails for lack of memory
> > in cred_alloc_blank() abort_creds() will be called. This
> > in turn calls put_cred() and put_cred_rcu(), which will
> > call security_cred_free() with ->security set to NULL.
> >
> > put_cred_rcu() is the only caller of security_cred_free().
> > The ->security == NULL check can be in either put_cred_rcu()
> > or in security_cred_free(). I suggest the latter as the
> > cleanest option.
>
> From 47134986133c822e1d88860fa2b108f92c97a7ff Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
> Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2019 17:31:50 -0800
> Subject: [PATCH 1/2] LSM: Check for NULL cred-security on free
>
> Check that the cred security blob has been set before trying
> to clean it up. There is a case during credential initialization
> that could result in this.
>
> Signed-off-by: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
> ---
> security/security.c | 7 +++++++
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/security/security.c b/security/security.c
> index a618e22df5c6..7bffc86d4e87 100644
> --- a/security/security.c
> +++ b/security/security.c
> @@ -1477,6 +1477,13 @@ int security_cred_alloc_blank(struct cred *cred, gfp_t gfp)
>
> void security_cred_free(struct cred *cred)
> {
> + /*
> + * There is a failure case in prepare_creds() that
> + * may result in a call here with ->security being NULL.
> + */
> + if (unlikely(cred->security == NULL))
> + return;
> +
> call_void_hook(cred_free, cred);
>
> kfree(cred->security);
> --
> 2.20.1
>
>

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-01-14 12:12    [W:0.113 / U:40.824 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site