lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Jan]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 0/9] Thermal throttling for SDM845
On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 11:22 AM Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> Add support for thermal throttling on SDM845.
>
> We introduce a generic flag to be used by cpufreq drivers to tell the
> cpufreq core to auto-register a thermal cooling device.
>
> There are a few miscellaneous fixes to keep checkpatch happy.
>
> If this approach is acceptable I can send a series converting other cpufreq
> drivers to use this flag and get rid of driver code.
>
> Amit Kucheria (9):
> [ALREADY QUEUED] cpufreq: qcom-hw: Move to device_initcall
> drivers: thermal: of-thermal: Print name of device node with error
> drivers: cpufreq: Add thermal_cooling_device pointer to struct
> cpufreq_policy
> cpufreq: Add a flag to auto-register a cooling device
> cpufreq: Replace open-coded << with BIT()
> cpufreq: qcom-hw: Register as a cpufreq cooling device
> arm64: dts: sdm845: Increase alert trip point to 95 degrees
> arm64: dts: sdm845: wireup the thermal trip points to cpufreq
> thermal: cpu_cooling: Clarify error message
>
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi | 193 +++++++++++++++++++++++----
> drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 13 ++
> drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c | 5 +-
> drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c | 2 +-
> drivers/thermal/of-thermal.c | 4 +-
> include/linux/cpufreq.h | 34 +++--
> 6 files changed, 210 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)

Would it be possible to split this series so as to put the cpufreq
patches separately?

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-01-14 11:27    [W:0.078 / U:27.272 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site