lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Jan]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 0/5] kvm "virtio pmem" device
On Sat 12-01-19 21:17:46, Pankaj Gupta wrote:
> > > > Right. Thinking about this I would be more concerned about the fact that
> > > > guest can effectively pin amount of host's page cache upto size of the
> > > > device/file passed to guest as PMEM, can't it Pankaj? Or is there some
> > > > QEMU
> > > > magic that avoids this?
> > >
> > > Yes, guest will pin these host page cache pages using 'get_user_pages' by
> > > elevating the page reference count. But these pages can be reclaimed by
> > > host
> > > at any time when there is memory pressure.
> >
> > Wait, how can the guest pin the host pages? I would expect this to
> > happen only when using vfio and device assignment. Otherwise, no the
> > host can't reclaim a pinned page, that's the whole point of a pin to
> > prevent the mm from reclaiming ownership.
>
> yes. You are right I just used the pin word but it does not actually pin pages
> permanently. I had gone through the discussion on existing problems with
> get_user_pages and DMA e.g [1] to understand Jan's POV. It does mention GUP
> pin pages so I also used the word 'pin'. But guest does not permanently pin
> these pages and these pages can be reclaimed by host.

OK, then I was just confused how virtio-pmem is going to work. Thanks for
explanation! So can I imagine this as guest mmaping the host file and
providing the mapped range as "NVDIMM pages" to the kernel inside the
guest? Or is it more complex?

Honza

--
Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-01-14 10:55    [W:0.083 / U:3.852 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site