lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Jan]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2] cpufreq: qcom: Read voltage LUT and populate OPP
Hi Taniya,

On Wed, Jan 09, 2019 at 01:37:28PM +0530, Taniya Das wrote:
> Add support to read the voltage look up table and populate OPP for all
> corresponding CPUS for consumers like the energy model could use the
> frequency and voltage from the OPP tables.
>
> Tested-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org>
> Signed-off-by: Taniya Das <tdas@codeaurora.org>
> ---
> drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c b/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c
> index d83939a..18f90bb 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c
> @@ -10,18 +10,21 @@
> #include <linux/module.h>
> #include <linux/of_address.h>
> #include <linux/of_platform.h>
> +#include <linux/pm_opp.h>
> #include <linux/slab.h>
>
> #define LUT_MAX_ENTRIES 40U
> #define LUT_SRC GENMASK(31, 30)
> #define LUT_L_VAL GENMASK(7, 0)
> #define LUT_CORE_COUNT GENMASK(18, 16)
> +#define LUT_VOLT GENMASK(11, 0)
> #define LUT_ROW_SIZE 32
> #define CLK_HW_DIV 2
>
> /* Register offsets */
> #define REG_ENABLE 0x0
> -#define REG_LUT_TABLE 0x110
> +#define REG_FREQ_LUT 0x110
> +#define REG_VOLT_LUT 0x114
> #define REG_PERF_STATE 0x920
>
> static unsigned long cpu_hw_rate, xo_rate;
> @@ -75,6 +78,7 @@ static int qcom_cpufreq_hw_read_lut(struct device *dev,
> void __iomem *base)
> {
> u32 data, src, lval, i, core_count, prev_cc = 0, prev_freq = 0, freq;
> + u32 volt;
> unsigned int max_cores = cpumask_weight(policy->cpus);
> struct cpufreq_frequency_table *table;
>
> @@ -83,11 +87,16 @@ static int qcom_cpufreq_hw_read_lut(struct device *dev,
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> for (i = 0; i < LUT_MAX_ENTRIES; i++) {
> - data = readl_relaxed(base + REG_LUT_TABLE + i * LUT_ROW_SIZE);
> + data = readl_relaxed(base + REG_FREQ_LUT +
> + i * LUT_ROW_SIZE);
> src = FIELD_GET(LUT_SRC, data);
> lval = FIELD_GET(LUT_L_VAL, data);
> core_count = FIELD_GET(LUT_CORE_COUNT, data);
>
> + data = readl_relaxed(base + REG_VOLT_LUT +
> + i * LUT_ROW_SIZE);
> + volt = FIELD_GET(LUT_VOLT, data) * 1000;
> +
> if (src)
> freq = xo_rate * lval / 1000;
> else
> @@ -98,6 +107,8 @@ static int qcom_cpufreq_hw_read_lut(struct device *dev,
> table[i].frequency = CPUFREQ_ENTRY_INVALID;
> } else {
> table[i].frequency = freq;
> + dev_pm_opp_add(get_cpu_device(policy->cpu),
> + freq * 1000, volt);
> dev_dbg(dev, "index=%d freq=%d, core_count %d\n", i,
> freq, core_count);
> }
> @@ -116,6 +127,8 @@ static int qcom_cpufreq_hw_read_lut(struct device *dev,
> if (prev_cc != max_cores) {
> prev->frequency = prev_freq;
> prev->flags = CPUFREQ_BOOST_FREQ;
> + dev_pm_opp_add(get_cpu_device(policy->cpu),
> + prev_freq * 1000, volt);
> }
>
> break;
> @@ -127,6 +140,7 @@ static int qcom_cpufreq_hw_read_lut(struct device *dev,
>
> table[i].frequency = CPUFREQ_TABLE_END;
> policy->freq_table = table;
> + dev_pm_opp_set_sharing_cpus(get_cpu_device(policy->cpu), policy->cpus);
>
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -159,10 +173,18 @@ static int qcom_cpufreq_hw_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
> struct device *dev = &global_pdev->dev;
> struct of_phandle_args args;
> struct device_node *cpu_np;
> + struct device *cpu_dev;
> struct resource *res;
> void __iomem *base;
> int ret, index;
>
> + cpu_dev = get_cpu_device(policy->cpu);
> + if (!cpu_dev) {
> + pr_err("%s: failed to get cpu%d device\n", __func__,
> + policy->cpu);
> + return -ENODEV;
> + }
> +
> cpu_np = of_cpu_device_node_get(policy->cpu);
> if (!cpu_np)
> return -EINVAL;
> @@ -205,6 +227,12 @@ static int qcom_cpufreq_hw_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
> goto error;
> }
>
> + ret = dev_pm_opp_get_opp_count(cpu_dev);
> + if (ret <= 0) {
> + dev_err(cpu_dev, "OPP table is not ready\n");
> + goto error;
> + }
> +
> policy->fast_switch_possible = true;
>
> return 0;
> @@ -217,6 +245,7 @@ static int qcom_cpufreq_hw_cpu_exit(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
> {
> void __iomem *base = policy->driver_data - REG_PERF_STATE;
>
> + dev_pm_opp_remove_all_dynamic(&global_pdev->dev);
> kfree(policy->freq_table);
> devm_iounmap(&global_pdev->dev, base);

With this patch I get the following message on a SDM845 platform:

[ 0.847515] cpu cpu0: _opp_is_duplicate: duplicate OPPs detected. Existing: freq: 1766400000, volt: 804000, enabled: 1. New: freq: 1766400000, volt: 804000, enabled: 1

A LUT that doesn't end with a boost frequency isn't handled
properly. The below patch fixes this.

Cheers

Matthias


From 481d7d6b190285c95f20e9e1b5ccd5c6b9910a0d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org>
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2019 15:54:54 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] cpufreq: qcom-hw: Don't add duplicate OPPs

Signed-off-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org>
---
drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c | 9 ++++-----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c b/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c
index 41557329777e5a..314c8d29276b5e 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c
@@ -103,15 +103,14 @@ static int qcom_cpufreq_hw_read_lut(struct device *dev,
else
freq = cpu_hw_rate / 1000;

- /* Ignore boosts in the middle of the table */
- if (core_count != max_cores) {
- table[i].frequency = CPUFREQ_ENTRY_INVALID;
- } else {
+ if ((freq != prev_freq) && (core_count == max_cores)) {
table[i].frequency = freq;
dev_pm_opp_add(get_cpu_device(policy->cpu),
- freq * 1000, volt);
+ freq * 1000, volt);
dev_dbg(dev, "index=%d freq=%d, core_count %d\n", i,
freq, core_count);
+ } else {
+ table[i].frequency = CPUFREQ_ENTRY_INVALID;
}

/*

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-01-15 01:29    [W:2.091 / U:0.688 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site