[lkml]   [2019]   [Jan]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 2/3] regulator: core: add helper to check if regulator is disabled in suspend
On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 10:24:26AM +0000, wrote:
> On 09.01.2019 18:57, Mark Brown wrote:

> > regulator state which feels fragile. But based on the cover letter
> > that's kind of like what the initial proposal about target states was so
> > perhaps this is the way we end up going...

> Are you talking about [1] ?

I can't follow that link right now, I'm working offline.

> I can get rid of this patch, take advantage of [3] and [4] and introduce
> also the regulator standby states. In this case, no matter the mapping b/w
> Linux power saving modes and AT91 SoC's power saving modes, we will be
> covered on misconfiguration (at least on SAMA5D2 Xplained board).

> And in patch 3/3 I could get rid of regulator checks and rely on DT (bad
> thing would be that in case of no input for regulator's state in
> mem/standby the board could not properly suspended/resumed), if any.

> What do you think about this?

Like I say I'm working offline so I can't check the links but it sounds
like you're saying that the existing suspend mode configuration features
are enough for your systems? If so that's great - certainly what you're
saying above sounds sensible to me but it's possible I misunderstood
something based on not having the links.
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-01-11 13:40    [W:0.108 / U:7.360 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site