[lkml]   [2019]   [Jan]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH v3 0/6] Static calls
On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 01:47:01AM +0000, Nadav Amit wrote:
> Here is an alternative idea (although similar to Steven’s and my code).
> Assume that we always clobber R10, R11 on static-calls explicitly, as anyhow
> should be done by the calling convention (and gcc plugin should allow us to
> enforce). Also assume that we hold a table with all source RIP and the
> matching target.
> Now, in the int3 handler can you take the faulting RIP and search for it in
> the “static-calls” table, writing the RIP+5 (offset) into R10 (return
> address) and the target into R11. You make the int3 handler to divert the
> code execution by changing pt_regs->rip to point to a new function that does:
> push R10
> jmp __x86_indirect_thunk_r11
> And then you are done. No?

IIUC, that sounds pretty much like what Steven proposed:

I liked the idea, BUT, how would it work for callee-saved PV ops? In
that case there's only one clobbered register to work with (rax).


 \ /
  Last update: 2019-01-11 16:16    [W:0.135 / U:0.060 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site