[lkml]   [2018]   [Sep]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH v5 07/13] block: Add PCI P2P flag for request queue and check support for requests

On 05/09/18 02:36 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 9/5/18 2:32 PM, Logan Gunthorpe wrote:
>> On 05/09/18 02:19 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
>>> On 9/5/18 2:18 PM, Logan Gunthorpe wrote:
>>>> On 05/09/18 02:14 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
>>>>> But if the caller must absolutely know where the bio will end up, then
>>>>> it seems super redundant. So I'd vote for killing this check, it buys
>>>>> us absolutely nothing and isn't even exhaustive in its current form.
>>>> Ok, I'll remove it for v6.
>>> Since the drivers needs to know it's doing it right, it might not
>>> hurt to add a sanity check helper for that. Just have the driver
>>> call it, and don't add it in the normal IO submission path.
>> I'm not sure I really see the value in that. It's the same principle in
>> asking the driver to do the WARN: if the developer knew enough to use
>> the special helper, they probably knew well enough to do the rest correctly.
> I don't agree with that at all. It's a "is my request valid" helper,
> it's not some obscure and rarely used functionality. You're making up
> this API right now, if you really want it done for every IO, make it
> part of the p2p submission process. You could even hide it behind a
> debug thing, if you like.

There is no special p2p submission process. In the nvme-of case we are
using the existing process and with the code in blk-core it didn't
change it's process at all. Creating a helper will create one and I can
look at making a pci_p2pdma_submit_bio() for v6; but if the developer
screws up and still calls the regular submit_bio() things will only be
very subtly broken and that won't be obvious.


 \ /
  Last update: 2018-09-05 23:04    [W:0.096 / U:1.312 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site