lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Sep]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH v13 04/13] x86/sgx: Architectural structures
On Tue, Sep 4, 2018 at 7:04 PM Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com> wrote:
>
> On 09/03/2018 06:16 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> >> + EBLOCK = 0x9,
> >> + EPA = 0xA,
> >> + EWB = 0xB,
> >> + ETRACK = 0xC,
> >> + EAUG = 0xD,
> >> + EMODPR = 0xE,
> >> + EMODT = 0xF,
> >> +};
> > Hmm... This E prefix confuses me with (system wide) error codes. Has
> > it been discussed before? If so, can you point on the conclusion why
> > the current format is good?
>
> Making them SGX_EWHATEVER isn't a horrible idea.

+1 here. Namespace will not shadow SDM naming scheme.

--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-09-04 18:07    [W:0.077 / U:3.632 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site