lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Sep]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH v13 04/13] x86/sgx: Architectural structures
From
Date
On 09/03/2018 06:16 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>> + EBLOCK = 0x9,
>> + EPA = 0xA,
>> + EWB = 0xB,
>> + ETRACK = 0xC,
>> + EAUG = 0xD,
>> + EMODPR = 0xE,
>> + EMODT = 0xF,
>> +};
> Hmm... This E prefix confuses me with (system wide) error codes. Has
> it been discussed before? If so, can you point on the conclusion why
> the current format is good?

Making them SGX_EWHATEVER isn't a horrible idea.


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-09-04 18:05    [W:0.097 / U:31.716 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site