lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Sep]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Subject[PATCH 4.14 092/165] Btrfs: fix btrfs_write_inode vs delayed iput deadlock
Date
4.14-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>

commit 3c4276936f6fbe52884b4ea4e6cc120b890a0f9f upstream.

We recently ran into the following deadlock involving
btrfs_write_inode():

[ +0.005066] __schedule+0x38e/0x8c0
[ +0.007144] schedule+0x36/0x80
[ +0.006447] bit_wait+0x11/0x60
[ +0.006446] __wait_on_bit+0xbe/0x110
[ +0.007487] ? bit_wait_io+0x60/0x60
[ +0.007319] __inode_wait_for_writeback+0x96/0xc0
[ +0.009568] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x40/0x40
[ +0.009565] inode_wait_for_writeback+0x21/0x30
[ +0.009224] evict+0xb0/0x190
[ +0.006099] iput+0x1a8/0x210
[ +0.006103] btrfs_run_delayed_iputs+0x73/0xc0
[ +0.009047] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x799/0x8c0
[ +0.009567] btrfs_write_inode+0x81/0xb0
[ +0.008008] __writeback_single_inode+0x267/0x320
[ +0.009569] writeback_sb_inodes+0x25b/0x4e0
[ +0.008702] wb_writeback+0x102/0x2d0
[ +0.007487] wb_workfn+0xa4/0x310
[ +0.006794] ? wb_workfn+0xa4/0x310
[ +0.007143] process_one_work+0x150/0x410
[ +0.008179] worker_thread+0x6d/0x520
[ +0.007490] kthread+0x12c/0x160
[ +0.006620] ? put_pwq_unlocked+0x80/0x80
[ +0.008185] ? kthread_park+0xa0/0xa0
[ +0.007484] ? do_syscall_64+0x53/0x150
[ +0.007837] ret_from_fork+0x29/0x40

Writeback calls:

btrfs_write_inode
btrfs_commit_transaction
btrfs_run_delayed_iputs

If iput() is called on that same inode, evict() will wait for writeback
forever.

btrfs_write_inode() was originally added way back in 4730a4bc5bf3
("btrfs_dirty_inode") to support O_SYNC writes. However, ->write_inode()
hasn't been used for O_SYNC since 148f948ba877 ("vfs: Introduce new
helpers for syncing after writing to O_SYNC file or IS_SYNC inode"), so
btrfs_write_inode() is actually unnecessary (and leads to a bunch of
unnecessary commits). Get rid of it, which also gets rid of the
deadlock.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 3.2+
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
[Omar: new commit message]
Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

---
fs/btrfs/inode.c | 26 --------------------------
fs/btrfs/super.c | 1 -
2 files changed, 27 deletions(-)

--- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
@@ -6152,32 +6152,6 @@ err:
return ret;
}

-int btrfs_write_inode(struct inode *inode, struct writeback_control *wbc)
-{
- struct btrfs_root *root = BTRFS_I(inode)->root;
- struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans;
- int ret = 0;
- bool nolock = false;
-
- if (test_bit(BTRFS_INODE_DUMMY, &BTRFS_I(inode)->runtime_flags))
- return 0;
-
- if (btrfs_fs_closing(root->fs_info) &&
- btrfs_is_free_space_inode(BTRFS_I(inode)))
- nolock = true;
-
- if (wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_ALL) {
- if (nolock)
- trans = btrfs_join_transaction_nolock(root);
- else
- trans = btrfs_join_transaction(root);
- if (IS_ERR(trans))
- return PTR_ERR(trans);
- ret = btrfs_commit_transaction(trans);
- }
- return ret;
-}
-
/*
* This is somewhat expensive, updating the tree every time the
* inode changes. But, it is most likely to find the inode in cache.
--- a/fs/btrfs/super.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/super.c
@@ -2271,7 +2271,6 @@ static const struct super_operations btr
.sync_fs = btrfs_sync_fs,
.show_options = btrfs_show_options,
.show_devname = btrfs_show_devname,
- .write_inode = btrfs_write_inode,
.alloc_inode = btrfs_alloc_inode,
.destroy_inode = btrfs_destroy_inode,
.statfs = btrfs_statfs,

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-09-03 19:25    [W:0.429 / U:4.740 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site