| From | Greg Kroah-Hartman <> | Subject | [PATCH 4.14 090/165] btrfs: use correct compare function of dirty_metadata_bytes | Date | Mon, 3 Sep 2018 18:56:16 +0200 |
| |
4.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Ethan Lien <ethanlien@synology.com>
commit d814a49198eafa6163698bdd93961302f3a877a4 upstream.
We use customized, nodesize batch value to update dirty_metadata_bytes. We should also use batch version of compare function or we will easily goto fast path and get false result from percpu_counter_compare().
Fixes: e2d845211eda ("Btrfs: use percpu counter for dirty metadata count") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Signed-off-by: Ethan Lien <ethanlien@synology.com> Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
--- fs/btrfs/disk-io.c | 10 ++++++---- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
--- a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c @@ -1098,8 +1098,9 @@ static int btree_writepages(struct addre fs_info = BTRFS_I(mapping->host)->root->fs_info; /* this is a bit racy, but that's ok */ - ret = percpu_counter_compare(&fs_info->dirty_metadata_bytes, - BTRFS_DIRTY_METADATA_THRESH); + ret = __percpu_counter_compare(&fs_info->dirty_metadata_bytes, + BTRFS_DIRTY_METADATA_THRESH, + fs_info->dirty_metadata_batch); if (ret < 0) return 0; } @@ -4030,8 +4031,9 @@ static void __btrfs_btree_balance_dirty( if (flush_delayed) btrfs_balance_delayed_items(fs_info); - ret = percpu_counter_compare(&fs_info->dirty_metadata_bytes, - BTRFS_DIRTY_METADATA_THRESH); + ret = __percpu_counter_compare(&fs_info->dirty_metadata_bytes, + BTRFS_DIRTY_METADATA_THRESH, + fs_info->dirty_metadata_batch); if (ret > 0) { balance_dirty_pages_ratelimited(fs_info->btree_inode->i_mapping); }
|