lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Sep]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH 3/7] vfio: add sdmdev support
From
Date
Hi,

On 09/03/2018 08:52 AM, Kenneth Lee wrote:
> From: Kenneth Lee <liguozhu@hisilicon.com>
>
> SDMDEV is "Share Domain Mdev". It is a vfio-mdev. But differ from
> the general vfio-mdev, it shares its parent's IOMMU. If Multi-PASID
> support is enabled in the IOMMU (not yet in the current kernel HEAD),
> multiple process can share the IOMMU by different PASID. If it is not
> support, only one process can share the IOMMU with the kernel driver.
>

If only for share domain purpose, I don't think it's necessary to create
a new device type.

> Currently only the vfio type-1 driver is updated to make it to be aware
> of.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kenneth Lee <liguozhu@hisilicon.com>
> Signed-off-by: Zaibo Xu <xuzaibo@huawei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Zhou Wang <wangzhou1@hisilicon.com>
> ---
> drivers/vfio/Kconfig | 1 +
> drivers/vfio/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/vfio/sdmdev/Kconfig | 10 +
> drivers/vfio/sdmdev/Makefile | 3 +
> drivers/vfio/sdmdev/vfio_sdmdev.c | 363 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c | 151 ++++++++++++-
> include/linux/vfio_sdmdev.h | 96 ++++++++
> include/uapi/linux/vfio_sdmdev.h | 29 +++
> 8 files changed, 648 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 drivers/vfio/sdmdev/Kconfig
> create mode 100644 drivers/vfio/sdmdev/Makefile
> create mode 100644 drivers/vfio/sdmdev/vfio_sdmdev.c
> create mode 100644 include/linux/vfio_sdmdev.h
> create mode 100644 include/uapi/linux/vfio_sdmdev.h
>

[--cut for short --]

> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
> index d9fd3188615d..ba73231d8692 100644
> --- a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
> @@ -41,6 +41,7 @@
> #include <linux/notifier.h>
> #include <linux/dma-iommu.h>
> #include <linux/irqdomain.h>
> +#include <linux/vfio_sdmdev.h>
>
> #define DRIVER_VERSION "0.2"
> #define DRIVER_AUTHOR "Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>"
> @@ -89,6 +90,8 @@ struct vfio_dma {
> };
>
> struct vfio_group {
> + /* iommu_group of mdev's parent device */
> + struct iommu_group *parent_group;
> struct iommu_group *iommu_group;
> struct list_head next;
> };
> @@ -1327,6 +1330,109 @@ static bool vfio_iommu_has_sw_msi(struct iommu_group *group, phys_addr_t *base)
> return ret;
> }
>
> +/* return 0 if the device is not sdmdev.
> + * return 1 if the device is sdmdev, the data will be updated with parent
> + * device's group.
> + * return -errno if other error.
> + */
> +static int vfio_sdmdev_type(struct device *dev, void *data)
> +{
> + struct iommu_group **group = data;
> + struct iommu_group *pgroup;
> + int (*_is_sdmdev)(struct device *dev);
> + struct device *pdev;
> + int ret = 1;
> +
> + /* vfio_sdmdev module is not configurated */
> + _is_sdmdev = symbol_get(vfio_sdmdev_is_sdmdev);
> + if (!_is_sdmdev)
> + return 0;
> +
> + /* check if it belongs to vfio_sdmdev device */
> + if (!_is_sdmdev(dev)) {
> + ret = 0;
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + pdev = dev->parent;
> + pgroup = iommu_group_get(pdev);
> + if (!pgroup) {
> + ret = -ENODEV;
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + if (group) {
> + /* check if all parent devices is the same */
> + if (*group && *group != pgroup)
> + ret = -ENODEV;
> + else
> + *group = pgroup;
> + }
> +
> + iommu_group_put(pgroup);
> +
> +out:
> + symbol_put(vfio_sdmdev_is_sdmdev);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +/* return 0 or -errno */
> +static int vfio_sdmdev_bus(struct device *dev, void *data)
> +{
> + struct bus_type **bus = data;
> +
> + if (!dev->bus)
> + return -ENODEV;
> +
> + /* ensure all devices has the same bus_type */
> + if (*bus && *bus != dev->bus)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + *bus = dev->bus;
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +/* return 0 means it is not sd group, 1 means it is, or -EXXX for error */
> +static int vfio_iommu_type1_attach_sdgroup(struct vfio_domain *domain,
> + struct vfio_group *group,
> + struct iommu_group *iommu_group)
> +{
> + int ret;
> + struct bus_type *pbus = NULL;
> + struct iommu_group *pgroup = NULL;
> +
> + ret = iommu_group_for_each_dev(iommu_group, &pgroup,
> + vfio_sdmdev_type);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + goto out;
> + else if (ret > 0) {
> + domain->domain = iommu_group_share_domain(pgroup);
> + if (IS_ERR(domain->domain))
> + goto out;
> + ret = iommu_group_for_each_dev(pgroup, &pbus,
> + vfio_sdmdev_bus);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + goto err_with_share_domain;
> +
> + if (pbus && iommu_capable(pbus, IOMMU_CAP_CACHE_COHERENCY))
> + domain->prot |= IOMMU_CACHE;
> +
> + group->parent_group = pgroup;
> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&domain->group_list);
> + list_add(&group->next, &domain->group_list);
> +
> + return 1;
> + }

This doesn't match the function name. It only gets the domain from the
parent device. It hasn't been really attached.

> +
> + return 0;
> +
> +err_with_share_domain:
> + iommu_group_unshare_domain(pgroup);
> +out:
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> static int vfio_iommu_type1_attach_group(void *iommu_data,
> struct iommu_group *iommu_group)
> {
> @@ -1335,8 +1441,8 @@ static int vfio_iommu_type1_attach_group(void *iommu_data,
> struct vfio_domain *domain, *d;
> struct bus_type *bus = NULL, *mdev_bus;
> int ret;
> - bool resv_msi, msi_remap;
> - phys_addr_t resv_msi_base;
> + bool resv_msi = false, msi_remap;
> + phys_addr_t resv_msi_base = 0;
>
> mutex_lock(&iommu->lock);
>
> @@ -1373,6 +1479,14 @@ static int vfio_iommu_type1_attach_group(void *iommu_data,
> if (mdev_bus) {
> if ((bus == mdev_bus) && !iommu_present(bus)) {
> symbol_put(mdev_bus_type);
> +
> + ret = vfio_iommu_type1_attach_sdgroup(domain, group,
> + iommu_group);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + goto out_free;
> + else if (ret > 0)
> + goto replay_check;

Here you get the domain from the parent device and save it for later
use. The actual attaching is ignored.

I don't think this follows the philosophy of this function. It actually
make all devices in the group with the same bus type to share a single
domain.

Further more, the parent domain might be a domain of type
IOMMU_DOMAIN_DMA. That will not be able to use as an
IOMMU_DOMAIN_UNMANAGED domain for iommu APIs.

Best regards,
Lu Baolu

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-09-03 04:57    [W:0.177 / U:5.364 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site