lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Sep]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Subject[PATCH 4.4 57/80] fuse: Dont access pipe->buffers without pipe_lock()
Date
4.4-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com>

commit a2477b0e67c52f4364a47c3ad70902bc2a61bd4c upstream.

fuse_dev_splice_write() reads pipe->buffers to determine the size of
'bufs' array before taking the pipe_lock(). This is not safe as
another thread might change the 'pipe->buffers' between the allocation
and taking the pipe_lock(). So we end up with too small 'bufs' array.

Move the bufs allocations inside pipe_lock()/pipe_unlock() to fix this.

Fixes: dd3bb14f44a6 ("fuse: support splice() writing to fuse device")
Signed-off-by: Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v2.6.35
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

---
fs/fuse/dev.c | 7 +++++--
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/fs/fuse/dev.c
+++ b/fs/fuse/dev.c
@@ -1991,11 +1991,14 @@ static ssize_t fuse_dev_splice_write(str
if (!fud)
return -EPERM;

+ pipe_lock(pipe);
+
bufs = kmalloc(pipe->buffers * sizeof(struct pipe_buffer), GFP_KERNEL);
- if (!bufs)
+ if (!bufs) {
+ pipe_unlock(pipe);
return -ENOMEM;
+ }

- pipe_lock(pipe);
nbuf = 0;
rem = 0;
for (idx = 0; idx < pipe->nrbufs && rem < len; idx++)

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-09-03 19:50    [W:0.311 / U:2.456 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site