lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Sep]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH V5 0/6] perf and x86/intel_rdt: Fix lack of coordination with perf
On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 10:39:01PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Sep 2018, Reinette Chatre wrote:
>
> > Dear Maintainers,
>
> Sorry for replying late.
>
> > On 9/20/2018 7:11 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 10:29:05AM -0700, Reinette Chatre wrote:
> > >> Reinette Chatre (6):
> > >> perf/core: Add sanity check to deal with pinned event failure
> > >> perf/x86: Add helper to obtain performance counter index
> > >> x86/intel_rdt: Remove local register variables
> > >> x86/intel_rdt: Create required perf event attributes
> > >> x86/intel_rdt: Use perf infrastructure for measurements
> > >> x86/intel_rdt: Re-enable pseudo-lock measurements
> > >>
> > >> Documentation/x86/intel_rdt_ui.txt | 22 +-
> > >> arch/x86/events/core.c | 21 ++
> > >> arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h | 1 +
> > >> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_rdt_pseudo_lock.c | 372 ++++++++++++--------
> > >> kernel/events/core.c | 6 +
> > >> 5 files changed, 261 insertions(+), 161 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > Yeah, these look good, thanks!
> > >
> > > Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
> > >
> >
> > Could you please consider this series for inclusion into v4.19?
>
> So in principle I'm having no objections as this really is mostly a RDT
> only issue.
>
> Peter, any objections against the Perf part of it, aside the core patch
> which is an obvious fix?

Nope, look up a few lines to observe my Ack ;-)

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-09-28 09:00    [W:0.048 / U:9.940 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site