Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Thu, 27 Sep 2018 22:39:01 +0200 (CEST) | From | Thomas Gleixner <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH V5 0/6] perf and x86/intel_rdt: Fix lack of coordination with perf |
| |
On Fri, 21 Sep 2018, Reinette Chatre wrote:
> Dear Maintainers,
Sorry for replying late.
> On 9/20/2018 7:11 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 10:29:05AM -0700, Reinette Chatre wrote: > >> Reinette Chatre (6): > >> perf/core: Add sanity check to deal with pinned event failure > >> perf/x86: Add helper to obtain performance counter index > >> x86/intel_rdt: Remove local register variables > >> x86/intel_rdt: Create required perf event attributes > >> x86/intel_rdt: Use perf infrastructure for measurements > >> x86/intel_rdt: Re-enable pseudo-lock measurements > >> > >> Documentation/x86/intel_rdt_ui.txt | 22 +- > >> arch/x86/events/core.c | 21 ++ > >> arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h | 1 + > >> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_rdt_pseudo_lock.c | 372 ++++++++++++-------- > >> kernel/events/core.c | 6 + > >> 5 files changed, 261 insertions(+), 161 deletions(-) > > > > Yeah, these look good, thanks! > > > > Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> > > > > Could you please consider this series for inclusion into v4.19?
So in principle I'm having no objections as this really is mostly a RDT only issue.
Peter, any objections against the Perf part of it, aside the core patch which is an obvious fix?
Thanks,
tglx
|  |