lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Sep]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH net-next v6 23/23] net: WireGuard secure network tunnel
From
Date
On 25.09.2018 16:56, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> Extensive documentation and description of the protocol and
> considerations, along with formal proofs of the cryptography, are> available at:
>
> * https://www.wireguard.com/
> * https://www.wireguard.com/papers/wireguard.pdf
[]
> +enum { HANDSHAKE_DSCP = 0x88 /* AF41, plus 00 ECN */ };
[]
> + if (skb->protocol == htons(ETH_P_IP)) {
> + len = ntohs(ip_hdr(skb)->tot_len);
> + if (unlikely(len < sizeof(struct iphdr)))
> + goto dishonest_packet_size;
> + if (INET_ECN_is_ce(PACKET_CB(skb)->ds))
> + IP_ECN_set_ce(ip_hdr(skb));
> + } else if (skb->protocol == htons(ETH_P_IPV6)) {
> + len = ntohs(ipv6_hdr(skb)->payload_len) +
> + sizeof(struct ipv6hdr);
> + if (INET_ECN_is_ce(PACKET_CB(skb)->ds))
> + IP6_ECN_set_ce(skb, ipv6_hdr(skb));
> + } else
[]
> + skb_queue_walk (&packets, skb) {
> + /* 0 for no outer TOS: no leak. TODO: should we use flowi->tos
> + * as outer? */
> + PACKET_CB(skb)->ds = ip_tunnel_ecn_encap(0, ip_hdr(skb), skb);
> + PACKET_CB(skb)->nonce =
> + atomic64_inc_return(&key->counter.counter) - 1;
> + if (unlikely(PACKET_CB(skb)->nonce >= REJECT_AFTER_MESSAGES))
> + goto out_invalid;
> + }
Hi,

is there documentation and/or rationale for ecn handling?
Quick search for ecn and dscp didn't reveal any.

Regards,
Ivan

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-09-26 18:01    [W:0.334 / U:3.152 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site