lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Sep]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v10 03/26] KVM: s390: refactor crypto initialization
On Fri, 21 Sep 2018 19:18:57 -0400
Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@linux.ibm.com> wrote:

> On 09/12/2018 03:42 PM, Tony Krowiak wrote:
> > From: Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@linux.ibm.com>
> >
> > This patch refactors the code that initializes and sets up the
> > crypto configuration for a guest. The following changes are
> > implemented via this patch:
> >
> > 1. Prior to the introduction of AP device virtualization, it
> > was not necessary to provide guest access to the CRYCB
> > unless the MSA extension 3 (MSAX3) facility was installed
> > on the host system. With the introduction of AP device
> > virtualization, the CRYCB must be made accessible to the
> > guest if the AP instructions are installed on the host
> > and are to be provided to the guest.
> >
> > 2. Introduces a flag indicating AP instructions executed on
> > the guest shall be interpreted by the firmware. It is
> > initialized to indicate AP instructions are to be
> > to be interpreted and is used to set the SIE bit for
> > each vcpu during vcpu setup.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@linux.ibm.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>
> > Acked-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
> > Acked-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
> > Tested-by: Michael Mueller <mimu@linux.ibm.com>
> > Tested-by: Farhan Ali <alifm@linux.ibm.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
> > ---
> > arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 2 +
> > arch/s390/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h | 1 +
> > arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c | 71 ++++++++++++++++++--------------------
> > 3 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)

(...)

> The fixup! patch below modifies this patch (03/26) to illustrate how
>
> David's recommendation will be implemented for v11 of the series. It
>
> is one of three fixup! patches (the other two are in responses to
> 11/26
> and 25/26) included to generate discussion in v10 rather than
>
> waiting until v11 for comments.

(...)

Looks good to me.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-09-24 12:35    [W:0.115 / U:0.324 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site