lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Sep]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH v7 2/2] cpufreq: qcom-hw: Add support for QCOM cpufreq HW driver
From
Date
Hello Stephen,


On 8/24/2018 12:08 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Taniya Das (2018-08-08 03:15:26)
>>
>>
>> On 8/8/2018 11:52 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Binding describes hardware controllable by the OS. That's the reality.
>>>> Let's not add mandatory clock bindings for clocks that the OS can't do
>>>> anything about.
>>>>
>>>
>>> It seems that you believe clks should only be used to turn on/off and
>>> control rates. That is not the whole truth. Sometimes clks are there
>>> just to express the clk frequencies that are present in the design so
>>> that drivers can figure out what to do.
>>>
>>
>> Stephen,
>>
>> As this clock is not configurable by linux clock drivers and we really
>> do not care the parent src(as mentioned by Saravana) to generate the
>> 300MHz, would it be good to define a fixed rate clock so as to express
>> the HW connectivity & frequency?
>>
>
> As a hack that works great, but why do we need to workaround problems by
> adding a fixed rate clk to DT for this PLL? The PLL is provided by GCC
> node so it should be connected to the GCC node.
>

Please help with review the next patch series which would take the PLL
phandle from DT.

--
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member
of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation.

--

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-09-23 11:35    [W:0.048 / U:9.724 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site