lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Sep]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [RFC PATCH] glibc: Perform rseq(2) registration at nptl init and thread creation
On Wed, 19 Sep 2018, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:

> Here is a rough prototype registering rseq(2) TLS for each thread
> (including main), and unregistering for each thread (excluding
> main). "rseq" stands for Restartable Sequences.

A final patch would need to add documentation and tests and a NEWS entry
and fix various coding style issues.

> diff --git a/nptl/Versions b/nptl/Versions
> index e7f691da7a..7316c2815d 100644
> --- a/nptl/Versions
> +++ b/nptl/Versions
> @@ -275,6 +275,7 @@ libpthread {
> mtx_init; mtx_lock; mtx_timedlock; mtx_trylock; mtx_unlock; mtx_destroy;
> call_once; cnd_broadcast; cnd_destroy; cnd_init; cnd_signal;
> cnd_timedwait; cnd_wait; tss_create; tss_delete; tss_get; tss_set;
> + __rseq_abi; __rseq_refcount;

That's the GLIBC_2.28 section, but 2.28 is already out. New symbols would
need to go in GLIBC_2.29 or later (and the ABI test baselines would all
need updating).

> diff --git a/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/rseq.h b/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/rseq.h

This looks like it's coming from the Linux kernel. Can't the relevant
uapi header just be used directly without copying into glibc (with due
care to ensure that glibc still builds if the kernel headers used for the
build are too old - you need such conditionals anyway if they don't define
the relevant syscall number)?

--
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-09-19 18:38    [W:0.146 / U:0.812 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site