lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Sep]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH v1 RESEND 6/9] x86/kvm/mmu: make space for source data caching in struct kvm_mmu
From
Date
On Tue, 2018-09-18 at 18:09 +0200, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
> In preparation to MMU reconfiguration avoidance we need a space to
> cache source data. As this partially intersects with kvm_mmu_page_role,
> create 64bit sized union kvm_mmu_role holding both base_role and
> extended data. No functional change.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 14 +++++++++++++-
>  arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c              | 19 ++++++++++++-------
>  arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c              |  2 +-
>  3 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> index 527aaf45eba6..6ca7d28d57e9 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> @@ -273,6 +273,18 @@ union kvm_mmu_page_role {
>   };
>  };
>  
> +union kvm_mmu_scache {

What about "kvm_mmu_extended_role" and a variable name of "ext"?
scache might be interpreted as "shadow cache", whereas I think you
intend "source cache".  And it isn't immediately clear (to me) what
"source" refers to.

> + unsigned int word;
> +};
> +
> + unsigned long as_u64;
> + struct {
> + union kvm_mmu_page_role base_role;

Would it make sense to shorten this to simply "base"?  The usage
looks like it's always deferenced in the context of kvm_mmu_role,
i.e. the "role" part appears to be redundant.  And if scache were
renamed we'd end up with e.g. mmu_role.base and mmu_role.ext.

> + union kvm_mmu_scache scache;
> + };
> +};
> +
>  struct kvm_rmap_head {
>   unsigned long val;
>  };
> @@ -360,7 +372,7 @@ struct kvm_mmu {
>   void (*update_pte)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp,
>      u64 *spte, const void *pte);
>   hpa_t root_hpa;
> - union kvm_mmu_page_role base_role;
> + union kvm_mmu_role mmu_role;
>   u8 root_level;
>   u8 shadow_root_level;
>   u8 ept_ad;
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
> index 5f167823c50d..8d8e6fa75fa3 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
> @@ -2359,7 +2359,7 @@ static struct kvm_mmu_page *kvm_mmu_get_page(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>   int collisions = 0;
>   LIST_HEAD(invalid_list);
>  
> - role = vcpu->arch.mmu->base_role;
> + role = vcpu->arch.mmu->mmu_role.base_role;
>   role.level = level;
>   role.direct = direct;
>   if (role.direct)
> @@ -4407,7 +4407,8 @@ static void reset_rsvds_bits_mask_ept(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>  void
>  reset_shadow_zero_bits_mask(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_mmu *context)
>  {
> - bool uses_nx = context->nx || context->base_role.smep_andnot_wp;
> + bool uses_nx = context->nx ||
> + context->mmu_role.base_role.smep_andnot_wp;
>   struct rsvd_bits_validate *shadow_zero_check;
>   int i;
>  
> @@ -4726,7 +4727,7 @@ static void init_kvm_tdp_mmu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  {
>   struct kvm_mmu *context = vcpu->arch.mmu;
>  
> - context->base_role.word = mmu_base_role_mask.word &
> + context->mmu_role.base_role.word = mmu_base_role_mask.word &
>     kvm_calc_tdp_mmu_root_page_role(vcpu).word;
>   context->page_fault = tdp_page_fault;
>   context->sync_page = nonpaging_sync_page;
> @@ -4807,7 +4808,7 @@ void kvm_init_shadow_mmu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>   else
>   paging32_init_context(vcpu, context);
>  
> - context->base_role.word = mmu_base_role_mask.word &
> + context->mmu_role.base_role.word = mmu_base_role_mask.word &
>     kvm_calc_shadow_mmu_root_page_role(vcpu).word;
>   reset_shadow_zero_bits_mask(vcpu, context);
>  }
> @@ -4816,7 +4817,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_init_shadow_mmu);
>  static union kvm_mmu_page_role
>  kvm_calc_shadow_ept_root_page_role(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool accessed_dirty)
>  {
> - union kvm_mmu_page_role role = vcpu->arch.mmu->base_role;
> + union kvm_mmu_page_role role = vcpu->arch.mmu->mmu_role.base_role;
>  
>   role.level = PT64_ROOT_4LEVEL;
>   role.direct = false;
> @@ -4846,7 +4847,8 @@ void kvm_init_shadow_ept_mmu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool execonly,
>   context->update_pte = ept_update_pte;
>   context->root_level = PT64_ROOT_4LEVEL;
>   context->direct_map = false;
> - context->base_role.word = root_page_role.word & mmu_base_role_mask.word;
> + context->mmu_role.base_role.word =
> + root_page_role.word & mmu_base_role_mask.word;
>   context->get_pdptr = kvm_pdptr_read;
>  
>   update_permission_bitmask(vcpu, context, true);
> @@ -5161,10 +5163,13 @@ static void kvm_mmu_pte_write(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t gpa,
>  
>   local_flush = true;
>   while (npte--) {
> + unsigned int base_role =
> + vcpu->arch.mmu->mmu_role.base_role.word;
> +
>   entry = *spte;
>   mmu_page_zap_pte(vcpu->kvm, sp, spte);
>   if (gentry &&
> -       !((sp->role.word ^ vcpu->arch.mmu->base_role.word)
> +       !((sp->role.word ^ base_role)
>         & mmu_base_role_mask.word) && rmap_can_add(vcpu))
>   mmu_pte_write_new_pte(vcpu, sp, spte, &gentry);
>   if (need_remote_flush(entry, *spte))
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> index 29af40b9239f..79e0b0570dd1 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> @@ -9290,7 +9290,7 @@ static int nested_vmx_eptp_switching(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>  
>   kvm_mmu_unload(vcpu);
>   mmu->ept_ad = accessed_dirty;
> - mmu->base_role.ad_disabled = !accessed_dirty;
> + mmu->mmu_role.base_role.ad_disabled = !accessed_dirty;
>   vmcs12->ept_pointer = address;
>   /*
>    * TODO: Check what's the correct approach in case

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-09-19 17:32    [W:0.100 / U:14.468 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site