lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Sep]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: dma_get_required_mask tidyups
    Any comments?  I have a a few things piled up that base on this, so
    some forward progress would be great.

    On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 08:13:29AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
    > Hi all,
    >
    > the dma_get_required_mask dma API implementation has always been a little
    > odd, in that we by default don't wire it up struct dma_map_ops, but
    > instead hard code a default implementation. powerpc and ia64 override
    > this default and either call a method or otherwise duplicate the default.
    >
    > This series always enabled the method and just falls back to the previous
    > default implementation when it is not available, as well as fixing up
    > a few bits in the default implementations. This already allows removing
    > the ia64 override of the implementation, and will also allow to remove
    > the powerpc one together with a few additional cleanups in the powerpc
    > code, but those will be sent separately with other powerpc DMA API
    > patches. Last but not least the method will allow us to return a more
    > sensible value for typical iommu dma_ops eventually, but that is left
    > to another series as well.
    > _______________________________________________
    > iommu mailing list
    > iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
    > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
    ---end quoted text---

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2018-09-19 17:03    [W:4.839 / U:0.044 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site