lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Sep]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] pinctrl: intel: Do pin translation in other GPIO operations as well
On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 03:04:23PM -0700, Rajat Jain wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 8:36 AM Mika Westerberg
> <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > For some reason I thought GPIOLIB handles translation from GPIO ranges
> > to pinctrl pins but it turns out not to be the case. This means that
> > when GPIOs operations are performed for a pin controller having a custom
> > GPIO base such as Cannon Lake and Ice Lake incorrect pin number gets
> > used internally.
> >
> > Fix this in the same way we did for lock/unlock IRQ operations and
> > translate the GPIO number to pin before using it.
> >
> > Fixes: a60eac3239f0 ("pinctrl: intel: Allow custom GPIO base for pad groups")
> > Reported-by: Rajat Jain <rajatja@google.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
>
> Tested-by: Rajat Jain <rajatja@google.com>
>
> This has fixed the issue for me.

Thanks for testing!

> One question, may not be related: I see this line in my logs everytime
> I export a pin (GPIO40 = pin 16 in this case). Is that an indication
> of a problem?
>
> "gpio gpiochip0: Persistence not supported for GPIO 40"

It seems to be debug print if the underlying GPIO chip does not support
PIN_CONFIG_PERSIST_STATE (pinctrl-intel.c does not). I would not worry
about it.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-09-19 10:40    [W:0.102 / U:2.280 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site